Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30541539›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Participation in group-based physical activity programmes for adults in Germany and associated factors: data from a nationwide cohort study.

Susanne Jordan, Susanne Krug, Elena von der Lippe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susanne JordanRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Box 65 0 61, 13302, Berlin, PO, Germany. JordanS@rki.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0721-1604
Susanne KrugRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Box 65 0 61, 13302, Berlin, PO, Germany.
Elena von der LippeRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Box 65 0 61, 13302, Berlin, PO, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCharacteristics of different participation groups can provide important information to increase participation in group-based physical activity programmes (GPAPs). This study examined four types of participation in GPAPs and the factors that characterised these participant groups.

methodsThe present sample comprised 3219 participants. The analyses were based on data from the 'German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults' (t1) conducted in 2009-2011, which included 3959 people who had participated in the 'German National Health Interview and Examination Survey 1998' (t0). The outcome variable was participation in GPAPs, classified in four groups: 'once at t1' (participation only at t1), 'twice' (participation at t0 and t1), 'once at t0' (participation only at t0) and 'no' (no participation). Predictor variables were sex, age, educational level, income, sports activity, self-rated health and counselling for physical activity, measured at t0 and t1. Frequencies with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each group were calculated. Four stepwise logistic regression models with estimated odds ratios (OR) were used to determine group differences.

resultsThe largest participant group was 'no' (80.8%). Among those who participated in GPAPs, the 'once at t1' group was the largest (13.1%), followed by the 'once at t0' (4.0%) and 'twice' (2.1%) groups. 'Once at t1' participation was associated with female sex (OR 2.58), being active in sports (OR 6.59), a high level of education (OR 1.88). If additionally health status and the physician's counselling are included into the models, then having fair/poor/very poor health (OR 1.71) and having had physician counselling on physical activity (OR 2.50) are relevant factors. For 'twice' participation, being female (OR 5.19) and practising sports (OR 4.51) were predictors.

conclusionsGPAPs should be tailored to build on previous experience of sports activities and to reach men as well as people with low education, groups that have been the least reached. To reach more people and encourage participation in GPAPs, providing opportunity for physician counselling for physical activity may be promising, especially with groups of poorer health.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesExerciseFemaleGermanyHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultCohort studyGerman health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS1)Group programmeHealth behaviour change programmeHealth promotionHealth-related behaviourPhysical activityPreventionTraining course

Identifiers

PMID30541539
PMCPMC6292065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.