Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30541528›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2018

Quality of care in family planning services in rural Mozambique with a focus on long acting reversible contraceptives: a cross-sectional survey.

Anna Galle, Heleen Vermandere, Sally Griffin, Málica de Melo, Lino Machaieie, Dirk Van Braeckel, Olivier Degomme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna GalleInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, UZP 114, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. anna.galle@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-1427-5067
Heleen VermandereInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, UZP 114, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Sally GriffinInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Rua das Flores no 34, Impasse 1085/87, Maputo, Mozambique.
Málica de MeloInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Rua das Flores no 34, Impasse 1085/87, Maputo, Mozambique.
Lino MachaieieInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Rua das Flores no 34, Impasse 1085/87, Maputo, Mozambique.
Dirk Van BraeckelInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, UZP 114, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Olivier DegommeInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, UZP 114, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Mozambique, both the government and partners have undertaken efforts over the last decade to improve FP (family planning) services, especially through training health care providers and promoting the uptake of LARCs (Long Acting Reversible Contraceptives). Despite this, uptake of FP methods has not increased significantly. This study aims to examine women's knowledge on LARCs, including their main sources of information, and the quality of care of FP services in rural areas.

methodsWe conducted a repeated cross-sectional study, interviewing 417 women leaving FP consultations in 15 health facilities in Maputo Province, Mozambique. The main quality outputs measured were: 1)discussed, preferred and received contraceptive methods, 2)information received on usage and side-effects, 3)client-provider interaction, 4)being informed about the need for a follow-up visit 5)health examinations conducted and travel time to the facility. In addition, knowledge on LARCs was measured among the clients as well as sources of information regarding FP methods. Taking into account the design effect of the study, Chi-square statistics were used to detect differences between groups and linear regression analyses to identify associations between sources of information and higher knowledge.

resultsWe found that IUDs (intrauterine devices) and implants were discussed in 23 and 33% of the consultations respectively, but only administered in a very few cases(< 1%). Half of the women were counselled on side-effects of contraceptives; this did not differ between first time clients and follow-up clients. Almost all women(98%) were satisfied with the received service and 83% of the women found the waiting time acceptable. Health examinations were performed on 18% of the women. Overall, women's knowledge about LARCs was poor and misconceptions are still common. Women who had received FP information through outreach activities had better knowledge than those counselled at a facility.

conclusionsOur study highlights that only a minority of the women received information regarding LARCs during the consultation and that usage is almost non-existent. Counseling about all types of contraceptives during the consultation is sub-optimal, resulting in poorly informed clients. Multifaceted long-term interventions, focusing on both users and providers, are needed to improve uptake of contraceptives (including LARCs) in rural areas.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesContraceptionContraceptive AgentsCounselingCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMozambiqueRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultContraceptive AgentsFamily planning servicesLong acting reversible contraceptivesMozambiqueQuality of careSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID30541528
PMCPMC6291923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.