Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30541527›Full record

ReviewBMC medical education2018

A novel 6D-approach to radically transform undergraduate medical education: preliminary reflections from MBRU.

Yajnavalka Banerjee, Aida J Azar, Christopher Tuffnell, Peter J Lansberg, Riad Bayoumi, David Davis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yajnavalka BanerjeeDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Academic Medical Center, Dubai Health Care City (DHCC), Dubai, 505055, United Arab Emirates. yaj.banerjee@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7546-8893
Aida J AzarDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Academic Medical Center, Dubai Health Care City (DHCC), Dubai, 505055, United Arab Emirates.
Christopher TuffnellDigital Learning, The Center for Outcomes & Research in Education (CORE), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Academic Medical Center, Dubai Health Care City (DHCC), Dubai, 505055, United Arab Emirates.
Peter J LansbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Section Molecular Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, Building 3226, Room 04.14, Internal Zip Code EA12, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713, Groningen, AV, Netherlands.
Riad BayoumiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Academic Medical Center, Dubai Health Care City (DHCC), Dubai, 505055, United Arab Emirates.
David DavisDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDesigners of undergraduate medical education (UME) need to address the exponentially expanding volume and variability of scientific knowledge, where by didactic teaching techniques need to be augmented by innovative student-centric pedagogical strategies and implementation of milieus, where information, communication and technology-enabled tools are seamlessly integrated, and lifelong information gathering, assimilation, integration and implementation is the ultimate goal. In UME, the basic sciences provide a solid scaffold allowing students to develop their personal critical decisional framework as well as define the understanding of normal human physiology, pivotal for the identification, categorization and management of pathophysiology. However, most medical schools confine themselves to "stagnant curricula", with the implementation of traditional "teacher centered" pedagogical techniques in the dissemination of the courses pertaining to basic sciences in UME.

methodTo tackle the above paucity, we present a novel "6D-Approach" for the dissemination of concepts in basic sciences through mentored journal-clubs. The approach is informed by a teaching principle derived from Constructivism. The technique in which the 6D-approach can be implemented in UME, is shown using an example from a first-year course of Molecular Biology and Principles of Genetics at our medical school. A reflection on the impact of 6D-Approach for students as well as instructors is also presented.

resultThe 6D-approach was positively received by the students and the formal feedback for the course: Molecular Biology and Principles of Genetics, where the approach was repeatedly employed, indicated that students expressed satisfaction with the teaching strategies employed in the course, with ~ 89% of the students in the cohort strongly agreeing with the highest grading score "extremely satisfied". Further, the approach through the use of mentored journal clubs encourages retention of knowledge, critical thinking, metacognition, collaboration and leadership skills in addition to self-evaluation and peer feedback.

conclusionHence, through the 6D-Approach, our attempt is to initiate, advance and facilitate critical thinking, problem-solving and self-learning in UME, demonstrated by graduating accomplished, competent and safe medical practitioners.

Indexed as

LeadershipLearningProblem SolvingThinkingCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFormative FeedbackHumansModels, TheoreticalSchools, MedicalBasic sciencesConstructivismJournal-clubLearning-theoryMedical educationNovel pedagogical techniqueUMEUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID30541527
PMCPMC6292027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.