Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30541505›Full record

Observational studyBMC pediatrics2018

Point-of-care testing for procalcitonin in identifying bacterial infections in young infants: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Thomas Waterfield, Julie-Ann Maney, Martin Hanna, Derek Fairley, Michael D Shields

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03509727 (Point-of-care-testing for Procalcitonin in Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections in Young Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03509727 completednot on this map

Point-of-care-testing for Procalcitonin in Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections in Young Infants: a Diagnostic Accuracy Study

TypeobservationalSponsorBelfast Health and Social Care TrustRan2017 to 2018Enrolled126ConditionsSepsis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas WaterfieldCentre for Experimental Medicine, Wellcome Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK. twaterfield01@qub.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9452-7716
Julie-Ann ManeyBelfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Martin HannaBelfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Derek FairleyBelfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Michael D ShieldsCentre for Experimental Medicine, Wellcome Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK.
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary objective of this study was to report on the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care testing (POCT) for procalcitonin (PCT) in identifying invasive bacterial infections in young infants. Invasive bacterial infection was defined as the isolation of a bacterial pathogen in blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture.

methodsThis was a prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study. Young infants less than 90 days of age presenting to the Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children with signs of possible bacterial infection were eligible for inclusion. Eligible infants underwent point-of-care testing for procalcitonin in the emergency department. Testing was performed by clinical staff using 0.5 ml of whole blood. Results were available within 20 min.

results126 children were included over a 5-month period between September 2017 and January 2018. There were 14 children diagnosed with bacterial infections (11.1%). Of these 4 children were diagnosed with invasive bacterial infections (3.2%). POCT procalcitonin demonstrated an excellent diagnostic accuracy for identifying children with invasive bacterial infection area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97(95% CI, 0.94 to 1.0). At a cut-off value of 1.0 ng/ml is highly accurate at identifying infants at risk of invasive bacterial infection with a sensitivity and specificity of 1.00 and 0.92 respectively.

conclusionsPoint-of-care procalcitonin can be performed quickly in the emergency department and demonstrates an excellent diagnostic accuracy for the identification of young infants with invasive bacterial infections.

trial registrationNCT03509727 Retrospectively registered on 26th April 2018.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingArea Under CurveBacteremiaBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleProcalcitoninProspective StudiesBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinProcalcitoninBiomarkerFebrileInfantInfectionPCTPediatricsProcalcitoninSepsis

Identifiers

PMID30541505
PMCPMC6292055
OpenAlexW2905080954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.