SynthesisBMC pediatrics2018
What is the impact of the use of transanastomotic feeding tube on patients with esophageal atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk and protective factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage in esophageal and gastrointestinal surgery: an umbrella review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Surgical repair of esophageal atresia: do trans-anastomotic feeding tubes have an impact on the outcome?Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Esophageal atresia with and without tracheoesophageal fistula: a 2016-2024 single-center cohort study in Saudi Arabia stratified by gap length.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2025Article
- Evidence-based advances in minimally invasive surgery in infants with congenital gastrointestinal anomalies: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2024Review
- Thoracoscopic oesophageal atresia/tracheo-oesophageal fistula (OA/TOF) repair is associated with a higher stricture rate: a single institution's experience.Pediatric surgery international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe transanastomotic feeding tube (TAFT) is widely used around the world in patients with esophageal atresia (EA). However, the safety of the use of TAFT is still unknown and remains to be clarified.
methodsThe following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane. Studies comparing outcomes in patients with the use of TAFT (TAFT+) and patients without the use of TAFT (TAFT-) were scrutinized. The quality of included studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale score. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I
resultsFour retrospective controlled studies involving 455 patients were included. The pooled estimates showed that the use of TAFT significantly increased the risk of stricture, with a risk ratio (RR) of 1.83 (95% CI 1.30-2.58; P = 0.0005). The meta-analyses of other postoperative complications did not show significant differences between TAFT+ and TAFT- group, with a RR of 1.65 (95% CI 0.93-2.93; P = 0.09) for anastomotic leakage, 0.91 (95% CI 0.34-2.44; P = 0.85) for sepsis, 1.89 (95% CI 0.22-16.20; P = 0.56) for tracheomalacia, 0.50 (95% CI 0.13-1.93; P = 0.31) for gastroesophageal reflux, 1.29 (95% CI 0.28-5.92; P = 0.74) for wound infection, and 0.97 (95% CI 0.03-36.75; p = 0.99) for pneumonia.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the use of TAFT in patients with EA significantly increases the risk of stricture. However, TAFT is not associated with other complications, including anastomotic leakage, sepsis, tracheomalacia, gastroesophageal reflux, wound infection and pneumonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.