Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30541428›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

A multi-omics approach for identifying important pathways and genes in human cancer.

H Robert Frost, Christopher I Amos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Integrative Computational Framework,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The variome concept: focus on CNVariome.Molecular cytogenetics · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H Robert FrostDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, 03755, NH, USA. rob.frost@dartmouth.edu.
Christopher I AmosDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, 03755, NH, USA.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Transdisciplinary Research in Cancer of the Lung (TRICL)U19CA148127 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I., LE MARCHAND, LOIC · 2010 to 2014
$10.9M
Quantitative Biology Research InstituteP20GM103534 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I. · 2012 to 2016
$8.6M
Coordinating Center: Molecular and Cellular Findings of Screen-Detected LesionsU01CA196386 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I. · 2015 to 2020
$4.1M
Tissue-specific gene set testingK01LM012426 · NLM · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI FROST, HILDRETH · 2016 to 2018
$259k
National Institutes of Health K01LM012426National Institutes of Health P30CA023108National Institutes of Health U01CA196386National Institutes of Health U19CA148127National Institutes of Health (US) P20GM103534NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS U01 CA196386NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148127NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103534NLM NIH HHS K01 LM012426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer develops when pathways controlling cell survival, cell fate or genome maintenance are disrupted by the somatic alteration of key driver genes. Understanding how pathway disruption is driven by somatic alterations is thus essential for an accurate characterization of cancer biology and identification of therapeutic targets. Unfortunately, current cancer pathway analysis methods fail to fully model the relationship between somatic alterations and pathway activity.

resultsTo address these limitations, we developed a multi-omics method for identifying biologically important pathways and genes in human cancer. Our approach combines single-sample pathway analysis with multi-stage, lasso-penalized regression to find pathways whose gene expression can be explained largely in terms of gene-level somatic alterations in the tumor. Importantly, this method can analyze case-only data sets, does not require information regarding pathway topology and supports personalized pathway analysis using just somatic alteration data for a limited number of cancer-associated genes. The practical effectiveness of this technique is illustrated through an analysis of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas using gene sets from the Molecular Signatures Database.

conclusionsNovel insights into the pathophysiology of human cancer can be obtained from statistical models that predict expression-based pathway activity in terms of non-silent somatic mutations and copy number variation. These models enable the identification of biologically important pathways and genes and support personalized pathway analysis in cases where gene expression data is unavailable.

Indexed as

GenomicsHumansNeoplasmsCancer genomicsDriver mutationsGene set testingPathway analysis

Identifiers

PMID30541428
PMCPMC6292115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.