Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30541426›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Subject level clustering using a negative binomial model for small transcriptomic studies.

Qian Li, Janelle R Noel-MacDonnell, Devin C Koestler, Ellen L Goode, Brooke L Fridley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Differential Expression Analysis of Long Noncoding RNAs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qian LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Janelle R Noel-MacDonnellChildren's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Devin C KoestlerDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Ellen L GoodeDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Brooke L FridleyDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. brooke.fridley@moffitt.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7739-7956

Funding

Mentoring CoreP20GM103418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SUSAN J. BROWN · 2012 to 2026
$63.0M
Transgenic & Gene-Targeting Shared ResourceP30CA168524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NICOLE L NOLLEN · 2012 to 2026
$40.1M
National Cancer Institute P30 CA168524NCI NIH HHS P30 CA168524NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnsupervised clustering represents one of the most widely applied methods in analysis of high-throughput 'omics data. A variety of unsupervised model-based or parametric clustering methods and non-parametric clustering methods have been proposed for RNA-seq count data, most of which perform well for large samples, e.g. N ≥ 500. A common issue when analyzing limited samples of RNA-seq count data is that the data follows an over-dispersed distribution, and thus a Negative Binomial likelihood model is often used. Thus, we have developed a Negative Binomial model-based (NBMB) clustering approach for application to RNA-seq studies.

resultsWe have developed a Negative Binomial Model-Based (NBMB) method to cluster samples using a stochastic version of the expectation-maximization algorithm. A simulation study involving various scenarios was completed to compare the performance of NBMB to Gaussian model-based or Gaussian mixture modeling (GMM). NBMB was also applied for the clustering of two RNA-seq studies; type 2 diabetes study (N = 96) and TCGA study of ovarian cancer (N = 295). Simulation results showed that NBMB outperforms GMM applied with different transformations in majority of scenarios with limited sample size. Additionally, we found that NBMB outperformed GMM for small clusters distance regardless of sample size. Increasing total number of genes with fixed proportion of differentially expressed genes does not change the outperformance of NBMB, but improves the overall performance of GMM. Analysis of type 2 diabetes and ovarian cancer tumor data with NBMB found good agreement with the reported disease subtypes and the gene expression patterns. This method is available in an R package on CRAN named NB.MClust.

conclusionUse of Negative Binomial model based clustering is advisable when clustering over dispersed RNA-seq count data.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalNormal DistributionCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleTranscriptomeClusteringEM algorithmGaussian mixture modelModel-basedNegative binomialRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID30541426
PMCPMC6292049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.