Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30541385›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2019

Evaluation of serologic testing of rams in the management of Brucella ovis in a domestic sheep flock.

Lindsey A Branscom, Todd E Cornish, Kerry S Sondgeroth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Semen quality and pathological lesions in rams naturally infected withThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of 2 ELISAs for detecting exposure toJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsey A BranscomDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Wyoming State Veterinary Laboratory, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
Todd E CornishDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Wyoming State Veterinary Laboratory, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
Kerry S SondgerothDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Wyoming State Veterinary Laboratory, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
University of Wyoming · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucella ovis is a bacterial pathogen present in most major sheep-producing regions of the world. The pathogen is associated with ram infertility, decreased ewe conception rates, and premature lambs. Twenty ELISA seropositive or indeterminate rams were culled from a B. ovis-positive flock, and donated to the Wyoming State Veterinary Laboratory for evaluation of infection. Tissues from each ram were collected at autopsy for additional testing, including bacterial culture, PCR, and histopathology. Of 17 seropositive rams, 11 rams were also positive by culture and PCR, and had evidence of mild histologic lesions; 1 seropositive ram was positive by culture with mild histologic lesions, but negative by PCR. Five seropositive rams were negative by culture and PCR and had no histologic lesions. Three indeterminate rams were negative by culture and by PCR and had no histologic lesions. The tissues in which B. ovis was most often detected included the epididymis, vesicular gland, and ampulla. Although this was a small study, the observation that 5 of 17 (29%) rams that were initially seropositive had no evidence of infection is interesting. A convalescent test for valuable seropositive animals prior to culling may be useful, and reproductive tissues may be evaluated postmortem if confirmatory testing is desired.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrucella ovisBrucellosisMaleSerologic TestsSheepSheep DiseasesSheep, DomesticWyomingELISAhistopathologyPCRram epididymitissheep

Identifiers

PMID30541385
PMCPMC6505769
OpenAlexW2904567501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.