Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30541147›Full record

ArticleILAR journal2018

Xenotransplantation: Progress Along Paths Uncertain from Models to Application.

Jeffrey L Platt, Marilia Cascalho, Jorge A Piedrahita

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ILAR journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From waste to wealth: Repurposing slaughterhouse waste for xenotransplantation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Future of Transplantation.The New England journal of medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Xenotransplantation: A New Era.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey L PlattSurgery, Microbiology & Immunology, and Transplantation Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Marilia CascalhoSurgery, Microbiology & Immunology, and Transplantation Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jorge A PiedrahitaTranslational Medicine and The Comparative Medicine Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Hepatocyte xenografts for treatment of acute liver failureR01AI122369 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FOX, IRA J., PLATT, JEFFREY L · 2016 to 2020
$5.0M
Transgenesis and XenotransplantationR01HL051587 · NHLBI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI PIEDRAHITA, JORGE A · 1994 to 2013
$3.2M
Immunodeficient Pigs for Stem Cell­-Based Regenerative MedicineR01OD023138 · OD · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI PIEDRAHITA, JORGE A · 2017 to 2020
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL051587NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI122369NIH HHS R01 OD023138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than a century, transplantation of tissues and organs from animals into man, xenotransplantation, has been viewed as a potential way to treat disease. Ironically, interest in xenotransplantation was fueled especially by successful application of allotransplantation, that is, transplantation of human tissue and organs, as a treatment for a variety of diseases, especially organ failure because scarcity of human tissues limited allotransplantation to a fraction of those who could benefit. In principle, use of animals such as pigs as a source of transplants would allow transplantation to exert a vastly greater impact than allotransplantation on medicine and public health. However, biological barriers to xenotransplantation, including immunity of the recipient, incompatibility of biological systems, and transmission of novel infectious agents, are believed to exceed the barriers to allotransplantation and presently to hinder clinical applications. One way potentially to address the barriers to xenotransplantation is by genetic engineering animal sources. The last 2 decades have brought progressive advances in approaches that can be applied to genetic modification of large animals. Application of these approaches to genetic engineering of pigs has contributed to dramatic improvement in the outcome of experimental xenografts in nonhuman primates and have encouraged the development of a new type of xenograft, a reverse xenograft, in which human stem cells are introduced into pigs under conditions that support differentiation and expansion into functional tissues and potentially organs. These advances make it appropriate to consider the potential limitation of genetic engineering and of current models for advancing the clinical applications of xenotransplantation and reverse xenotransplantation.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsGene EditingGenetic EngineeringHeterograftsHumansImmunity, InnatePrimatesStem CellsSwineadaptive immunityclinical xenotransplantationgene editinginnate immunitymolecular incompatibilitynonhuman primatereverse xenografttransgenic pigxenotransplantationzoonosis

Identifiers

PMID30541147
PMCPMC6808066
OpenAlexW2905353953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.