ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
Gene expression models based on transcription factor binding events confer insight into functional cis-regulatory variants.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Review
- MACMIC Reveals A Dual Role of CTCF in Epigenetic Regulation of Cell Identity Genes.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Gene regulatory network inference as relaxed graph matching.Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2021Article
- Functional effects of variation in transcription factor binding highlight long-range gene regulation by epromoters.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- The spatial binding model of the pioneer factor Oct4 with its target genes during cell reprogramming.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Article
- What Do Neighbors Tell About You: The Local Context of Cis-Regulatory Modules Complicates Prediction of Regulatory Variants.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationDeciphering the functional roles of cis-regulatory variants is a critical challenge in genome analysis and interpretation. It has been hypothesized that altered transcription factor (TF) binding events are a central mechanism by which cis-regulatory variants impact gene expression levels. However, we lack a computational framework to understand and quantify such mechanistic contributions.
resultsWe present TF2Exp, a gene-based framework to predict the impact of altered TF-binding events on gene expression levels. Using data from lymphoblastoid cell lines, TF2Exp models were applied successfully to predict the expression levels of 3196 genes. Alterations within DNase I hypersensitive, CTCF-bound and tissue-specific TF-bound regions were the greatest contributing features to the models. TF2Exp models performed as well as models based on common variants, both in cross-validation and external validation. Combining TF alteration and common variant features can further improve model performance. Unlike variant-based models, TF2Exp models have the unique advantage to evaluate the functional impact of variants in linkage disequilibrium and uncommon variants. We find that adding TF-binding events altered only by uncommon variants could increase the number of predictable genes (R2 > 0.05). Taken together, TF2Exp represents a key step towards interpreting the functional roles of cis-regulatory variants in the human genome. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code and model training results are publicly available at https://github.com/wqshi/TF2Exp. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.