Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30540844›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Characterization of grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 genetic variants and application towards RT-qPCR assay design.

Alfredo Diaz-Lara, Vicki Klaassen, Kristian Stevens, Mysore R Sudarshana, Adib Rowhani, Hans J Maree, Kar Mun Chooi, Arnaud G Blouin, Nuredin Habili, Yashu Song and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic Diversity of Viral Populations Associated withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Alfredo Diaz-LaraDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Vicki KlaassenFoundation Plant Services, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Kristian StevensDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Mysore R SudarshanaUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Adib RowhaniDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Hans J MareeDepartment of Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Kar Mun ChooiThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
Arnaud G BlouinThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nuredin HabiliSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Yashu SongDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Kamyar AramDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Kari ArnoldUniversity of California, Cooperative Extension-Stanislaus County, Modesto, California, United States of America.
Monica L CooperUniversity of California, Cooperative Extension-Napa County, Napa, California, United States of America.
Lynn WunderlichUniversity of California, Cooperative Extension-Central Sierra, Placerville, California, United States of America.
Mark C BattanyUniversity of California, Cooperative Extension-San Luis Obispo County, San Luis Obispo, California, United States of America.
Larry J BettigaUniversity of California, Cooperative Extension-Monterey County, Monterey, California, United States of America.
Rhonda J SmithUniversity of California, Cooperative Extension-Sonoma County, Sonoma, California, United States of America.
Rachelle BesterDepartment of Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Huogen XiaoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Baozhong MengDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
John E PreeceNational Clonal Germplasm Repository, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Davis, California, United States of America.
Deborah GolinoDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Maher Al RwahnihDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California-Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-9234
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Guelph · CAPlant & Food Research · NZStellenbosch University · ZAAgricultural Research Service · USMonterey County Health Department · USNapa Valley College · USThe University of Adelaide · AUUnited States Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) is the most widely prevalent and economically important of the complex of RNA viruses associated with grapevine leafroll disease (GLD). Phylogenetic studies have grouped GLRaV-3 isolates into nine different monophyletic groups and four supergroups, making GLRaV-3 a genetically highly diverse virus species. In addition, new divergent variants have been discovered recently around the world. Accurate identification of the virus is an essential component in the management and control of GLRaV-3; however, the diversity of GLRaV-3, coupled with the limited sequence information, have complicated the development of a reliable detection assay. In this study, GLRaV-3 sequence data available in GenBank and those generated at Foundation Plant Services, University of California-Davis, was used to develop a new RT-qPCR assay with the capacity to detect all known GLRaV-3 variants. The new assay, referred to as FPST, was challenged against samples that included plants infected with different GLRaV-3 variants and originating from 46 countries. The FPST assay detected all known GLRaV-3 variants, including the highly divergent variants, by amplifying a small highly conserved region in the 3' untranslated terminal region (UTR) of the virus genome. The reliability of the new RT-qPCR assay was confirmed by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that can detect all known GLRaV-3 variants characterized to date. Additionally, three new GLRaV-3 divergent variants, represented by four isolates, were identified using a hierarchical testing process involving the FPST assay, GLRaV-3 variant-specific assays and high-throughput sequencing analysis. These variants were distantly related to groups I, II, III, V, VI, VII and IX, but much similar to GLRaV-3 variants with no assigned group; thus, they may represent new clades. Finally, based on the phylogenetic analysis, a new GLRaV-3 subclade is proposed and named as group X.

Indexed as

3' Untranslated RegionsClosteroviridaeGenetic VariationGenome, ViralReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionVitis3' Untranslated Regions

Identifiers

PMID30540844
PMCPMC6291115
OpenAlexW2903975653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.