Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30540772›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Divergent effects of brief contemplative practices in response to an acute stressor: A randomized controlled trial of brief breath awareness, loving-kindness, gratitude or an attention control practice.

Matthew J Hirshberg, Simon B Goldberg, Stacey M Schaefer, Lisa Flook, David Findley, Richard J Davidson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04125758 (Is Knowing the Body Knowing the Mind? Stress-physiology Coherence, Interoception, and Mindfulness), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04125758 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Is Knowing the Body Knowing the Mind? Stress-physiology Coherence, Interoception, and Mindfulness

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2020 to 2022Enrolled120ConditionsNot Seeking to Treat Any ConditionsArmsMindfulness training, Tracking time spent on mobile device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew J HirshbergCenter for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9070-1270
Simon B GoldbergCenter for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6888-0126
Stacey M SchaeferCenter for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Lisa FlookCenter for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
David FindleyCenter for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Richard J DavidsonCenter for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.

Funding

Wisconsin Center for the Neuroscience and Psychophysiology of MeditationP01AT004952 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DAVIDSON, RICHARD J · 2008 to 2018
$14.7M
NCCIH NIH HHS P01 AT004952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mindfulness practices are increasingly being utilized as a method for cultivating well-being. The term mindfulness is often used as an umbrella for a variety of different practices and many mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) contain multiple styles of practice. Despite the diversity of practices within MBIs, few studies have investigated whether constituent practices produce specific effects. We randomized 156 undergraduates to one of four brief practices: breath awareness, loving-kindness, gratitude, or to an attention control condition. We assessed practice effects on affect following brief training, and effects on affect and behavior after provocation with a stressor (i.e., Cold pressor test). Results indicate that gratitude training significantly improved positive affect compared to breath awareness (d = 0.58) and loving-kindness led to significantly greater reductions in implicit negative affect compared to the control condition (d = 0.59) immediately after brief practice. In spite of gains in positive affect, the gratitude group demonstrated increased reactivity to the stressor, reporting the CPT as significantly more aversive than the control condition (d = 0.46) and showing significantly greater increases in negative affect compared to the breath awareness, loving-kindness, and control groups (ds = 0.55, 0.60, 0.65, respectively). Greater gains in implicit positive affect following gratitude training predicted decreased post-stressor likability ratings of novel neutral faces compared to breath awareness, loving-kindness, and control groups (ds = - 0.39, -0.40, -0.33, respectively) as well. Moreover, the gratitude group was significantly less likely to donate time than the loving-kindness group in an ecologically valid opportunity to provide unrewarded support. These data suggest that different styles of contemplative practice may produce different effects in the context of brief, introductory practice and these differences may be heightened by stress. Implications for the study of contemplative practices are discussed.

Indexed as

AdultAffectAttentionAwarenessBreathing ExercisesEmotionsFemaleHumansLoveMaleMeditationMindfulnessRespirationStress, PsychologicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30540772
PMCPMC6291192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.