Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30540739›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2018

Integrative network-centric approach reveals signaling pathways associated with plant resistance and susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae.

Elizabeth K Brauer, George V Popescu, Dharmendra K Singh, Mauricio Calviño, Kamala Gupta, Bhaskar Gupta, Suma Chakravarthy, Sorina C Popescu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Robustness of plant quantitative disease resistance is provided by a decentralized immune network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth K BrauerThe Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
George V PopescuInstitute for Genomics, Biocomputing, and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, United States of America.
Dharmendra K SinghThe Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Mauricio CalviñoThe Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Kamala GuptaThe Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Bhaskar GuptaThe Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Suma ChakravarthyDepartment of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Sorina C PopescuDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, United States of America.
Cornell University · USIthaca College · USMississippi State University · US

Funding

Training and Mentoring Core P20GM103476 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI · PI MICHAEL R GARRETT · 2012 to 2026
$60.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant protein kinases form redundant signaling pathways to perceive microbial pathogens and activate immunity. Bacterial pathogens repress cellular immune responses by secreting effectors, some of which bind and inhibit multiple host kinases. To understand how broadly bacterial effectors may bind protein kinases and the function of these kinase interactors, we first tested kinase-effector (K-E) interactions using the Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato-tomato pathosystem. We tested interactions between five individual effectors (HopAI1, AvrPto, HopA1, HopM1, and HopAF1) and 279 tomato kinases in tomato cells. Over half of the tested kinases interacted with at least one effector, and 48% of these kinases interacted with more than three effectors, suggesting a role in the defense. Next, we characterized the role of select multi-effector-interacting kinases and revealed their roles in basal resistance, effector-triggered immunity (ETI), or programmed cell death (PCD). The immune function of several of these kinases was only detectable in the presence of effectors, suggesting that these kinases are critical when particular cell functions are perturbed or that their role is typically masked. To visualize the kinase networks underlying the cellular responses, we derived signal-specific networks. A comparison of the networks revealed a limited overlap between ETI and basal immunity networks. In addition, the basal immune network complexity increased when exposed to some of the effectors. The networks were used to successfully predict the role of a new set of kinases in basal immunity. Our work indicates the complexity of the larger kinase-based defense network and demonstrates how virulence- and avirulence-associated bacterial effectors alter sectors of the defense network.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsHost-Pathogen InteractionsPlant DiseasesPlant ImmunityPlant ProteinsProtein KinasesPseudomonas syringaeSignal TransductionSolanum lycopersicumVirulenceVirulence FactorsBacterial ProteinsPlant ProteinsProtein KinasesVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID30540739
PMCPMC6322785
OpenAlexW2904542816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.