Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30540411›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice2018

Screening, prevention and management of osteoporosis among Canadian adults.

Siobhan O'Donnell, Osteoporosis Surveillance Expert Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Design of a Computer Model for the Identification of Adolescent Swimmers at Risk of Low BMD.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. The pathophysiology of immunoporosis: innovative therapeutic targets.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siobhan O'DonnellPublic Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Osteoporosis Surveillance Expert Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study provides a benchmark for the nationwide use of osteoporosis screening, prevention and management strategies among Canadians aged 40 years and older (40+) using data collected one year prior to the release of Osteoporosis Canada's latest (2010) clinical practice guidelines.

methodsData are from the 2009 Canadian Community Health Survey-Osteoporosis Rapid Response Component. The study sample (n = 5704) was divided into four risk subgroups: (1) osteoporosis diagnosis and major fracture; (2) osteoporosis diagnosis only; (3) major fracture only; or (4) neither osteoporosis diagnosis nor major fracture. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed multinomial multivariate logistic regression analyses to examine factors independently associated with osteoporosis screening, prevention and management strategies. Estimates were weighted to represent the Canadian household population (40+) living in the 10 provinces.

resultsApproximately 10.1% of the population or 1.5 million Canadians 40+ reported having been diagnosed with osteoporosis. The majority related taking vitamin D or calcium supplements and having been prescribed osteoporosis medication(s), while less than 40% reported regular physical activity. Among those without a reported osteoporosis diagnosis, an estimated 6.7% or 1 million reported having had a major fracture, of which one-third reported having had a bone density test and less than half reported taking vitamin D supplements, calcium supplements or engaging in regular physical activity. Major fracture history was not associated with bone density testing or osteoporosis medication use.

conclusionA large proportion of Canadians at risk for osteoporosis-those with a major fracture history-are not undergoing bone density testing nor are they engaging in lifestyle approaches known to help maintain healthy bones. This study provides the historical information required to evaluate whether the latest clinical practice guidelines have had an impact on osteoporosis care in Canada.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedAge FactorsBone Density Conservation AgentsCalcium, DietaryCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesDietary SupplementsEducational StatusExerciseFemaleFractures, BoneHealth SurveysHumansIncomeBone Density Conservation AgentsCalcium, DietaryVitamin Ddisease managementhealth surveysosteoporosispreventionscreening

Identifiers

PMID30540411
PMCPMC6329580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.