ArticleJAMA psychiatry2019
Association of Antipsychotic Treatment With Risk of Unexpected Death Among Children and Youths.
Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiometabolic adverse effects of long-term antipsychotic treatment in children and adolescents with non-psychotic disorders: a systematic review of available evidence.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Stepped Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Aggressive Behavior: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Adjunctive Risperidone, Divalproex Sodium, or Placebo After Stimulant Medication Optimization.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Analysis of the prevalence of dyslipidemia in early-onset schizophrenia patients and its correlation with clinical characteristics.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Antipsychotic off-label use in the 21st century: An enduring public health concern.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2025Review
- Low to moderate-dose off-label use of second-generation antipsychotics seems to be safe in the light of cardiac adverse effects in child psychiatric patients.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Psychotropic Medication Use in 48,XXYY Syndrome.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025Article
- Association between a publicly funded universal drug program and antipsychotic and antidepressant medication dispensing to children.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Recalculation of the budgetary impact of risperidone use for Autism Spectrum Disorder: a case study using measured demand data, Brazil, 2017-2019.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025Article
- How Early-Life Antipsychotic Drug Administration Modifies Behavioral and Brain Function in Adulthood.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025Review
- From adventures to diagnosis: adolescent behavior in classic fiction through the eyes of newly licensed Czech psychiatrists - a vignette study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Early-life risperidone alters locomotor responses to apomorphine and quinpirole in adulthood.Behavioural brain research · 2024Article
- Risk of Death at 1 Year Following Postpartum Opioid Exposure.American journal of perinatology · 2024Article
- Association of Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and Two-Year All-Cause Mortality: A Population-Based Cohort Study of 33,221 Italian Continuous Users.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Drug overdose risk with benzodiazepine treatment in young adults: Comparative analysis in privately and publicly insured individuals.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2024Article
- Antipsychotic Medication Use In Medicaid-Insured Children Decreased Substantially Between 2008 And 2016.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2023Article
- Geographic variation and sociodemographic correlates of prescription psychotropic drug use among children and youth in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antidepressant and antipsychotic use among children and adolescents: a population-based study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Adherence to antipsychotic laboratory monitoring guidelines in children and youth: a population-based study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Trends in antipsychotic use among children and adolescents in Germany: a study using 2011-2020 nationwide outpatient claims data.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Children and youths who are prescribed antipsychotic medications have multiple, potentially fatal, dose-related cardiovascular, metabolic, and other adverse events, but whether or not these medications are associated with an increased risk of death is unknown. Objective: To compare the risk of unexpected death among children and youths who are beginning treatment with antipsychotic or control medications. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from 1999 through 2014 and included Medicaid enrollees aged 5 to 24 years in Tennessee who had no diagnosis of severe somatic illness, schizophrenia or related psychoses, or Tourette syndrome or chronic tic disorder. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2017, to August 15, 2018. Exposures: Current, new antipsychotic medication use at doses higher than 50 mg (higher-dose group) or 50 mg or lower chlorpromazine equivalents (lower-dose group) as well as control medications (ie, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medications, antidepressants, or mood stabilizers) (control group). Main Outcomes and Measures: Deaths during study follow-up while out of hospital or within 7 days after hospital admission, classified as either deaths due to injury or suicide or unexpected deaths. Secondary outcomes were unexpected deaths not due to overdose and death due to cardiovascular or metabolic causes. Results: This study included 189 361 children and youths in the control group (mean [SD] age, 12.0 [5.1] years; 43.4% female), 28 377 in the lower-dose group (mean [SD] age, 11.7 [4.4] years; 32.3% female), and 30 120 in the higher-dose group (mean [SD] age, 14.5 [4.8] years; 39.2% female). The unadjusted incidence of death in the higher-dose group was 146.2 per 100 000 person-years (40 deaths per 27 354 person-years), which was significantly greater than that in the control group (54.5 per 100 000 population; 67 deaths per 123 005 person-years) (P < .001). The difference was primarily attributable to the increased incidence of unexpected deaths in the higher-dose group (21 deaths; 76.8 per 100 000 population) compared with the control group (22 deaths; 17.9 per 100 000 population). The propensity score-adjusted hazard ratios were as follows: all deaths (1.80; 95% CI, 1.06-3.07), deaths due to unintentional injury or suicide (1.03; 95% CI, 0.53-2.01), and unexpected deaths (3.51; 95% CI, 1.54-7.96). The hazard ratio was 3.50 (95% CI, 1.35-9.11) for unexpected deaths not due to overdose and 4.29 (95% CI, 1.33-13.89) for deaths due to cardiovascular or metabolic causes. Neither the unadjusted nor adjusted incidence of death in the lower-dose group differed significantly from that in the control group. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that antipsychotic use is associated with increased risk of unexpected death and appear to reinforce recommendations for careful prescribing and monitoring of antipsychotic treatment for children and youths and to underscore the need for larger antipsychotic treatment safety studies in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.