ArticleJAMA dermatology2019
Association of Noninfectious Pneumonia With Ustekinumab Use.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Value of Macrogene Second-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis, Guidance of Drug Use, and Efficacy Monitoring of Infectious Pneumonia in Premature Infants.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- Inflammatory biomarkers associated with infection-related type I acute respiratory failure.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Safety assessment of ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease: a real-world analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Non-Infectious Pneumonitis and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in a Patient on Ustekinumab Treatment: Case Report and Literature Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Lung Involvement in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Shared Pathways and Unwanted Connections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- SGLT-2 inhibitors and euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis/diabetic ketoacidosis in FAERS: a pharmacovigilance assessment.Acta diabetologica · 2023 · on this mapArticle
- Stelara struck: a case of noninfectious pneumonitis secondary to ustekinumab.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Article
- Updated Insights on Cardiac and Vascular Risks of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Characteristics of anti-IL-17/23 biologics-induced interstitial pneumonia in patients with psoriasis.PloS one · 2021Article
- Adverse Events Associated With Radium-223 in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Disproportionality Analysis of FDA Data Reflecting Worldwide Utilization.Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducts ongoing public health safety surveillance for drug and therapeutic biologic products. Identifying cases of acute and subacute noninfectious pneumonia supports the public health mission of the FDA. Objective: To identify and analyze postmarketing cases of noninfectious pneumonia associated with ustekinumab use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective analysis of postmarketing (spontaneous) case reports reviewed the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the PubMed databases from September 25, 2009, through November 20, 2017. Twelve cases of new-onset acute and subacute noninfectious pneumonia were identified after general marketing of ustekinumab. Cases were excluded if the time to symptom onset was more than 2 years from ustekinumab initiation and if an alternative origin for the noninfectious pneumonia (other than drug-induced) was reported. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cases of noninfectious pneumonia associated with ustekinumab use were analyzed for baseline and demographic information, reason for ustekinumab use, symptoms, time to onset, dose sequence, laboratory and diagnostic information, and clinical outcome. Results: Of the 12 cases, 8 were identified from the FAERS database and 4 from PubMed. The 12 cases (7 men [58%] and 5 women [42%], with a median [range] age of 63 [27-80] years) included 7 interstitial pneumonia (58%), 3 eosinophilic pneumonia (25%), 1 organizing pneumonia (8%), and 1 hypersensitivity pneumonitis (8%) diagnoses. All 12 cases reported a serious outcome, including 7 hospitalizations (58%) and 1 respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (8%). No outcome of death was reported. All 12 cases were supportive of a temporal association; specifically, in 9 cases (75%), the pulmonary symptoms appeared after 1 to 3 doses of ustekinumab. In addition, 7 cases (58%) of positive dechallenge were reported, including 1 case of a positive rechallenge. Conclusions and Relevance: The postmarketing cases suggest an association between noninfectious pneumonia and use of ustekinumab; these findings have led to the addition of a new warning for ustekinumab users regarding the risk of developing noninfectious pneumonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.