ReviewAutonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical2018
Moving from the present to the future of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome - What we need.
Review in Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symptom Burden in Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) and Endometriosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Do Medications Actually Help in Patients with Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome?: A Qualitative Study.CJC open · 2026Article
- Two Different Hemodynamic Responses in ME/CFS Patients with Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome During Head-Up Tilt Testing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Simulation in Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2023Review
- Diagnosis and management of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022Review
- Whole-Blood MicroRNA Sequence Profiling and Identification of Specific miR-21 for Adolescents With Postural Tachycardia Syndrome.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): Priorities for POTS care and research from a 2019 National Institutes of Health Expert Consensus Meeting - Part 2.Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical · 2021Article
- Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): State of the science and clinical care from a 2019 National Institutes of Health Expert Consensus Meeting - Part 1.Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical · 2021Article
- Ganglionic Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies in Postural Tachycardia Syndrome.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2021Article
- Pain Management In Pediatric Patients With Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome: Current Insights.Journal of pain research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our understanding about Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) has advanced significantly over the last 25 years. Despite the significant advances that have been made in defining the syndrome and finding some treatments for our patients, there is much work to be done to significantly improve our understanding of the disorder and improve therapeutics. In this article, 5 NEEDS are identified that will be required over the next several years if we want future care to move beyond where we are in the present. These include: (1) a NEED for better administrative data to track POTS diagnoses and the impact of the illness; (2) a NEED to improve physician awareness about POTS, which is a prerequisite for improved access to care; (3) a NEED to better understand the multiple pathophysiologies underlying POTS and the roles of the different medical comorbidities; (4) a NEED for data on effective treatments for POTS; and (5) a NEED for more research funding to study POTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.