Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30539672›Full record

ArticleUpsala journal of medical sciences2018

Status one year after fertility assessment and counselling in women of reproductive age-a qualitative study.

Randi Sylvest, Emily Koert, Ida Vittrup, Kathrine Birch Petersen, Anders Nyboe Andersen, Anja Pinborg, Lone Schmidt

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Knowledge about the impact of age on fertility: a brief review.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Randi Sylvesta Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Fertility Clinic, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen , Hvidovre , Denmark.
Emily Koertb Fertility Clinic , University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Ida Vittrupb Fertility Clinic , University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Kathrine Birch Petersenc Fertility Clinic , University Hospital of Zealand, Køge , Denmark.
Anders Nyboe Andersenb Fertility Clinic , University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Anja Pinborgb Fertility Clinic , University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Lone Schmidtd Department of Public Health , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKHvidovre Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKZealand University Hospital Køge · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOver the past 50 years women and men have postponed family formation in high-income societies. Fertility assessment and counselling has been suggested as a method to reduce delayed childbearing and its consequences. This study explored women's perceptions of how attending a fertility assessment intervention influenced their decisions and choices regarding family formation and childbearing. MATERIAL AND

methodsFollow-up data from a longitudinal semi-structured qualitative interview study including 20 women aged 35-40 years seeking individual fertility counselling at the Fertility Assessment and Counselling Clinic at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. The interviews were conducted one year after their consultation. Data were analysed by qualitative content analysis.

resultsThe women perceived an increase in their knowledge after they had attended the counselling. The women saw the counselling as a catalyst for change-they changed their behaviour and relationship status. The women stopped thinking about the pros and cons of childbearing and acted instead. The women did not experience any regrets about acting. Some of the women felt that they were still in limbo as they were still in doubt concerning childbearing. The consultation had not given them an answer with a clear deadline in terms of delaying attempts to become pregnant, and this frustrated them.

conclusionsOur study highlights the impact of a fertility assessment and counselling intervention which included a perceived increase in knowledge. The clinic allows for an individualized approach to fertility awareness which is necessary given the unique nature of childbearing decisions.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthFamily Planning ServicesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCounselingDecision MakingDenmarkFemaleFertilityHumansLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesChildbearingfertilityfertility assessment and counsellingpostponing childbearingqualitative interviewswomen

Identifiers

PMID30539672
PMCPMC6327567
OpenAlexW2905284762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.