Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30539541›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2019

A new decision tree for diagnosis of osteoarthritis in primary care: international consensus of experts.

Johanne Martel-Pelletier, Emmanuel Maheu, Jean-Pierre Pelletier, Ludmila Alekseeva, Ouafa Mkinsi, Jaime Branco, Pierre Monod, Frédéric Planta, Jean-Yves Reginster, François Rannou

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Comparative outcome analyses of stromal vascular fractionWorld journal of experimental medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Johanne Martel-PelletierOsteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Emmanuel MaheuRheumatology Department, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Jean-Pierre PelletierOsteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Ludmila AlekseevaV.A. Nasonova Research Institute Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia.
Ouafa MkinsiIbn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca, Morocco.
Jaime BrancoDepartment of Rheumatology, NOVA Medical School, CEDOC, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, CHLO, Hospital Egas Moniz, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pierre MonodCabinet de Rhumatologie, Castelnaudary, France.
Frédéric PlantaPierre Fabre Consumer Health Care, Castres, France.
Jean-Yves ReginsterDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology, and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
François RannouService de rééducation et réadaptation de l'appareil locomoteur et des pathologies du rachis, Laboratoire de Pharmacologie, Toxicologie et Signalisation Cellulaire, Univ. Paris Descartes, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique -Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM UMR-S 1124, UFR Biomédicale des Saints Pères, Paris, France. francois.rannou@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAlthough osteoarthritis (OA) is managed mainly in primary care, general practitioners (GPs) are not always trained in its diagnosis, which leads to diagnostic delays, unnecessary resource utilization, and suboptimal patient outcomes.

methodsTo address this situation, an International Rheumatologic Board (IRB) of 8 experts from 3 continents developed guidelines for the diagnosis of OA in primary care. The focus was three major topologies: hip, knee, and hand/finger OA. The IRB used American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria.

resultsCare pathways based on clinical and radiological findings were developed to identify intervention thresholds for GPs/specialists. To optimize usefulness in the primary care setting, the guidelines were formatted as an uncomplicated, but comprehensive one-page decision tree for each topology, highlighting key aspects of the evaluation process and incorporating red flags. In a two-phase validation stage, the draft guidelines were evaluated by rheumatologists and GPs for project execution, content and perceived benefit. The strength of the guidelines lies in their user-friendly diagram and potential for broad application. Such guidelines will allow GPs to make an easy but definite diagnosis of OA and offer clear guidance about situations requiring an expert opinion. The guidelines have potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce the number of unnecessary procedures. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThis project demonstrated the feasibility of developing easy-to-use and effective visual decision trees to facilitate the diagnosis and management of OA of the hip, knee and hand/finger in primary care. The next step should be to conduct a large impact study of implementation of these recommendations in the diagnostic management of OA in general practice in different areas.

Indexed as

Decision TreesAlgorithmsFeasibility StudiesHandHand JointsHumansOsteoarthritisOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneePrimary Health CareCare pathwaysConsensusDiagnosisGeneral practitionersHandHipKneeOAPrimary careSpecialist intervention thresholds

Identifiers

PMID30539541
PMCPMC6514162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.