Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30539324›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2019

What is a cognitive map? Unravelling its mystery using robots.

Wai K Yeap, Md Hossain

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wai K YeapCentre for Artificial Intelligence Research, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. wai.yeap@aut.ac.nz.
Md HossainCentre for Artificial Intelligence Research, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite years of research into cognitive mapping, the process remains controversial and little understood. A computational theory of cognitive mapping is needed, but developing it is difficult due to the lack of a clear interpretation of the empirical findings. For example, without knowing what a cognitive map is or how landmarks are defined, how does one develop a computational theory for it? We thus face the conundrum of trying to develop a theory without knowing what is computed. In this paper, we overcome the conundrum by abandoning the idea that the process begins by integrating successive views to form a global map of the environment experienced. Instead, we argue that cognitive mapping begins by remembering views as local maps and we empower a mobile robot with the process and study its behaviour as it acquires its "cognitive map". Our results show that what is computed initially could be described as a "route" map and from it, some form of a "survey map" can be computed. The latter, as it turns out, bears much of the characteristics of a cognitive map. Based on our findings, we discuss what a cognitive map is, how cognitive mapping evolves and why such a process also supports the perception of a stable world.

Indexed as

CognitionAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceComputer SimulationHumansModels, PsychologicalOrientationRoboticsSpatial AnalysisSpatial NavigationCognitive mappingComputational modelSpatial cognitionView-based model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.