Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30539219›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2019

The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.

Philip P Roessler, Max Jaenisch, Manuel Kuhlmann, Miriam Wacker, P Johannes Wagenhäuser, Sascha Gravius, Dieter C Wirtz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Novel positioning guiders accurately assist in situ acetabular reconstruction for patients undergoing pelvic bone tumor resection.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum: revision endoprosthetics].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philip P RoesslerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. philip.roessler@ukbonn.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1574-0111
Max JaenischDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Manuel KuhlmannDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Miriam WackerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
P Johannes WagenhäuserDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sascha GraviusDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Dieter C WirtzDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcetabular revision of failed total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often associated with severe bone loss. Therefore, a variety of revision implant systems has been developed during recent years, with the augment-and-modular-cage system being one of the newest additions to this portfolio. Together with biologic downsizing by means of impaction bone grafting, this uncemented system promises a high modularity and versatility to treat all acetabular defects up to Paprosky types IIIa and IIIb without pelvic discontinuity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate first short-term results of its clinical application, both clinical functional and patient-reported as well as radiographic.

methodsForty-four patients (28 female, 16 male, mean age 70.9 ± 11.5 years) could be followed for a mean of 26 ± 10 months after acetabular revision with a novel augment-and-modular-cage system. Indications for revision included aseptic loosening (68%), septic loosening (16%), or others (16%) with bone loss Paprosky IIa up to IIIb without discontinuity. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) served as a primary outcome parameter. In addition, a number of patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) were collected including the Short Form 36 (SF-36), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and Visual Analogue Scale for Hip Pain (VAS Hip) as well as overall satisfaction. Radiographic changes between the pre- and postoperative center of rotation (COR) and various criteria of implant failure served as secondary outcome parameters.

resultsNo patients were lost to follow-up. Two implant-associated complications (partial flange breakage) without a need for revision surgery were detected, which represent a failure rate of 4.5%. Functional outcome as measured by mHHS increased from 49.4 ± 2.9 pre-operatively to 74.4 ± 3.1 at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). PROMs showed significant improvements in all pain-related categories, while other quality-of-life measurements only exhibited positive tendencies towards improvement. VAS Hip significantly improved from 6.5 ± 0.7 pre-operatively to 2.2 ± 0.6 at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Radiographic evaluation showed that reconstruction of the COR was possible, referenced to the contralateral side. The COR could be lateralized by 5.0 mm (n.s.) and caudalized by 10.3 mm (p < 0.001) comparing pre-operative and post-operative states, with complete osseointegration in 95% of the cases.

conclusionsTreatment with the augment-and-modular-cage system significantly improved clinical functional and patient-reported outcomes in cases of acetabular revision after failed THA. In addition, a good reconstruction of the COR could also be achieved. Therefore, this highly modular system can be considered as an effective treatment option in almost all cases of acetabular bone loss except for those of pelvic discontinuity. It offers the unique possibility of intra-operative implant customization according to the existing bone defect and host bone quality.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationHip ProsthesisAcetabulumAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipBone ResorptionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsseointegrationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRecovery of FunctionReoperationTreatment OutcomeAcetabular revision surgeryAcetabulumAugment-and-modular-cageHipModular cup arthroplastyUncemented fixation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.