ArticleVirusdisease2018
A report of human papilloma virus-16 associated vaginal carcinoma after thirty-two years of successful radiation therapy for cervical cancer.
Article in Virusdisease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Once the recommended 5-year recurrence-free follow-up is achieved for cervical cancers regular annual pelvic examination is mandatory. The main aim of presenting this short report is to emphasize the difficulties in the collection and interpretation of cytology samples from stenosed cervix or vault after pelvic irradiation. Radiotherapy can induce changes in the cellular morphology which may persist for many years. A 64-year old post-menopausal lady who had received radiation therapy 32 years back for cervical carcinoma stage IIb presented to the Gynecology outpatient department with vaginal spotting. Even though the patient was under regular follow-up for the initial 2 years, she was lost to further follow-ups. The patient was symptom-free except for one episode of spotting in August 2016 and the histopathological examination of the vault smear had ruled out malignancy. However, 1 month later she again presented with spotting and pelvic examination revealed a warty growth at the lateral vaginal wall. The tissue excision biopsy was tested positive for HPV-16 DNA and the histopathology confirmed vaginal squamous cell carcinoma. The association of human papilloma virus (HPV) in cervical cancers was well established and these patients manifest a higher risk of HPV-induced vaginal cancers. HPV DNA testing during follow-up may facilitate early recognition of HPV-related lower genital tract cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.