Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30539032›Full record

ReviewOpen forum infectious diseases2018

Microbial Identification Using DNA Target Amplification and Sequencing: Clinical Utility and Impact on Patient Management.

Tinzar Basein, Bradley J Gardiner, Gabriela M Andujar Vazquez, Andrew S Joel Chandranesan, Arthur R Rabson, Shira Doron, David R Snydman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open forum infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Gastrointestinal mucormycosis byMedical mycology case reports · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A case of cutaneousJAAD case reports · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnostic Value of 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction/Sanger Sequencing in Clinical Practice.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Clinical Utility of Universal Broad-Range Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplicon Sequencing for Pathogen Identification: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinical metagenomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tinzar BaseinDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases.ORCID 0000-0002-6460-2719
Bradley J GardinerDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases.ORCID 0000-0001-5609-3937
Gabriela M Andujar VazquezDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases.
Andrew S Joel ChandranesanDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases.ORCID 0000-0002-2077-4594
Arthur R RabsonDepartment of Pathology, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shira DoronDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases.ORCID 0000-0001-9139-0857
David R SnydmanDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases.ORCID 0000-0003-0119-3978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is increasingly used in patients with culture-negative infections; however, few studies have assessed the diagnostic utility of this test in this context. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who had clinical specimens sent for broad-range PCR, aiming to evaluate performance and determine impact on patient management. Organisms were identified in 21/71 samples. High numbers of polymorphonuclear leukocytes on Gram stain (odds ratio [OR], 4.17;

Indexed as

bacterial infectionbroad-range PCRculture negative

Identifiers

PMID30539032
PMCPMC6284463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.