ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2018
Electrocardiography vs. Auscultation to Assess Heart Rate During Cardiac Arrest With Pulseless Electrical Activity in Newborn Infants.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03913533 (Standard 6-sec Method Versus Tap-based Application Method to Assess Heart Rate at Birth - a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Standard 6-sec Method Versus Tap-based Application Method to Assess Heart Rate at Birth - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- RECOVER Guidelines: Newborn Resuscitation in Dogs and Cats. Evidence and Knowledge Gap Analysis With Treatment Recommendations.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001) · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-based neonatal heart rate monitoring technologies: Systematic review.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Article
- Addressing the Humans in the Delivery Room-Optimising Neonatal Monitoring and Decision-Making in Transition.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Newborn heart rate monitoring methods at birth and clinical outcomes: A systematic review.Resuscitation plus · 2024Review
- Vasopressin versus epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: A study protocol for a prospective, cluster, open label, single-center, randomized controlled phase 2 trial - The VERSE-Trial.Resuscitation plus · 2023Article
- Non-invasive measurements of respiration and heart rate across wildlife species using Eulerian Video Magnification of infrared thermal imagery.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Recent Update on Neonatal Resuscitation.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2022Review
- Is Chest Compression Superimposed with Sustained Inflation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation an Alternative to 3:1 Compression to Ventilation Ratio in Newborn Infants?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Return of Spontaneous Circulation Depends on Cardiac Rhythm During Neonatal Cardiac Arrest in Asphyxiated Newborn Animals.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Heart Rate Assessment during Neonatal Resuscitation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Evaluation of a Tap-Based Smartphone App for Heart Rate Assessment During Asphyxia in a Porcine Model of Neonatal Resuscitation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.