Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30538873›Full record

ArticleCase reports in infectious diseases2018

Successfully Treated Norovirus- and Sapovirus-Associated Diarrhea in Three Renal Transplant Patients.

Noha Ghusson, Gustavo Vasquez

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gastrointestinal tract and viral pathogens.World journal of virology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. PersistentIDCases · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. RecurringIDCases · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Norovirus disease among older adults.Therapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noha GhussonSidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Division of Infectious Diseases, 1015 Chestnut Street, Suite 1020, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9914-595X
Gustavo VasquezSidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Division of Infectious Diseases, 1015 Chestnut Street, Suite 1020, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0298-9233
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the burden of norovirus- and sapovirus-related diarrhea in renal transplant patients and to propose the use of nitazoxanide as a therapeutic option for treatment.

methodsWe reviewed three renal transplant patients with viral diarrhea requiring hospitalization due to acute renal failure and signs of graft rejection. All three patients were treated with nitazoxanide. We examined their clinical courses after therapy and compared time to resolution of symptoms and viral shedding.

resultsIn all three renal transplant patients, improvement of diarrheal illness was witnessed within one week of nitazoxanide initiation.

conclusionsInfectious diarrhea remains an underestimated yet significant cause of morbidity in solid organ transplant patients. Norovirus and sapovirus are often responsible for this presentation. Nitazoxanide was used as a treatment modality with success in reduction of symptoms, decreased duration of illness, and cessation of viral shedding.

Identifiers

PMID30538873
PMCPMC6260410
OpenAlexW2900912459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.