Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30538693›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2018

Occurrence and Dynamism of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Distinct Ecological Niches: A Multifaceted Functional Health Perspective.

Fanny George, Catherine Daniel, Muriel Thomas, Elisabeth Singer, Axel Guilbaud, Frédéric J Tessier, Anne-Marie Revol-Junelles, Frédéric Borges, Benoît Foligné

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  4. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Bacteriocins fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. PeerJ · 2026
    Article
  15. A fluorescent reporter system for trackingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fanny GeorgeUniversité de Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, Lille, France.
Catherine DanielUniversité de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019 - UMR 8204 - CIIL - Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France.
Muriel ThomasMicalis Institute, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Elisabeth SingerUniversité de Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, Lille, France.
Axel GuilbaudUniversité de Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, Lille, France.
Frédéric J TessierUniversité de Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, Lille, France.
Anne-Marie Revol-JunellesLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Biomolécules, École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaires - Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Frédéric BorgesLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des Biomolécules, École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaires - Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Benoît FolignéUniversité de Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U995 - LIRIC - Lille Inflammation Research International Center, Lille, France.
Lille Inflammation Research International Center · FRLaboratoire d'Ingénierie des BiomoléculesAgroParisTech · FRInserm · FRInstitut Pasteur de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are representative members of multiple ecosystems on earth, displaying dynamic interactions within animal and plant kingdoms in respect with other microbes. This highly heterogeneous phylogenetic group has coevolved with plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates, establishing either mutualism, symbiosis, commensalism, or even parasitism-like behavior with their hosts. Depending on their location and environment conditions, LAB can be dominant or sometimes in minority within ecosystems. Whatever their origins and relative abundance in specific anatomic sites, LAB exhibit multifaceted ecological and functional properties. While some resident LAB permanently inhabit distinct animal mucosal cavities, others are provided by food and may transiently occupy the gastrointestinal tract. It is admitted that the overall gut microbiome has a deep impact on health and diseases. Here, we examined the presence and the physiological role of LAB in the healthy human and several animal microbiome. Moreover, we also highlighted some dysbiotic states and related consequences for health, considering both the resident and the so-called "transionts" microorganisms. Whether LAB-related health effects act collectively or follow a strain-specificity dogma is also addressed. Besides the highly suggested contribution of LAB to interplay with immune, metabolic, and even brain-axis regulation, the possible involvement of LAB in xenobiotic detoxification processes and metal equilibrium is also tackled. Recent technological developments such as functional metagenomics, metabolomics, high-content screening and design

Indexed as

ecological nichesecosystemsfermented foodgut microbiotalactic acid bacteriaprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID30538693
PMCPMC6277688
OpenAlexW2902646532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.