ArticleGastroenterology & hepatology2018
Use and Interpretation of Enteropathogen Multiplex Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests in Patients With Suspected Infectious Diarrhea.
Article in Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Evaluation of Enteropathogen-Specific Disease Severity and Duration in Children With Acute Gastroenteritis.Pediatric emergency care · 2025Article
- Sapovirus: an emerging pathogen in kidney transplant recipients?Infection · 2024Article
- Detection and Characterization of Bacterial and Viral Acute Gastroenteritis among Outpatient Children under 5 Years Old in Guangzhou, China.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Luminex xTAGMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Is the Medium Still the Message? Culture-Independent Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infections.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Review
- Rapid molecular syndromic testing for aetiological diagnosis of gastrointestinal infections and targeted antimicrobial prescription: experience from a reference paediatric hospital in Spain.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021Article
- Performance of the QIAstat-Dx Gastrointestinal Panel for Diagnosing Infectious Gastroenteritis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
- Multicenter evaluation of the new QIAstat Gastrointestinal Panel for the rapid syndromic testing of acute gastroenteritis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute diarrheal illness due to gastrointestinal infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and around the world. Determining the causative organism in a timely manner assists with patient care, identifying outbreaks, providing infection control, and administering antimicrobial therapy when indicated. Traditional diagnostic modalities based on culture and immunoassays are limited by their low sensitivity and long turnaround time. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for enteric pathogens allow for the syndromic testing of stool for multiple pathogens simultaneously and have higher sensitivity with a shorter turnaround time. However, by not isolating the organism, NAATs do not provide drug susceptibility or confirmatory identification. Furthermore, NAATs cannot distinguish between true infection and carrier states. Nevertheless, several studies have demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of multiplex NAATs by reducing the length of hospital stay and cost of isolation. Five platforms are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration that can detect different bacteria, parasites, and viruses. The sensitivity and specificity of each platform depends on the targeted pathogens and whether the tests are performed on fresh stool, frozen stool, or in transport media. Overall, these tests have high sensitivity and specificity of more than 90% when used in symptomatic patients. Thus, multiplex NAAT gastrointestinal platforms offer several advantages compared to traditional methods. However, the interpretation of the results requires acknowledging the limitations of the tests and exercising clinical judgment. More studies are needed to establish the cost-effectiveness of multiplex NAATs and their impact on antibiotic stewardship and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30538605PMC6284344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.