Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30538555›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2018

A Phase II study of S-1 plus oral leucovorin in heavily treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Hung-Chih Hsu, Wen-Chi Chou, Feng-Che Kuan, Kuan-Der Lee, Kun-Ming Rau, Jen-Seng Huang, Tsai-Sheng Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hung-Chih HsuDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Guishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China, a481124@cgmh.org.tw.
Wen-Chi ChouDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Guishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China, a481124@cgmh.org.tw.
Feng-Che KuanCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, Republic of China, a481124@cgmh.org.tw.
Kuan-Der LeeDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital and Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Kun-Ming RauCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, Republic of China, a481124@cgmh.org.tw.
Jen-Seng HuangCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, Republic of China, a481124@cgmh.org.tw.
Tsai-Sheng YangDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Guishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China, a481124@cgmh.org.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFewer treatment options are available for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In early trials, S-1 monotherapy was effective for mCRC patients after chemotherapy failure and its combination with oral leucovorin therapy offers promising results in untreated mCRC. Hence, we conduct a Phase II trial to assess the efficacy of S-1 plus oral leucovorin (SL) in refractory mCRC that progressed after multiple prior standard therapies.

methodsIn this open-label, single-arm study, we enrolled the refractory mCRC patients who received fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan treatment and at least one targeted therapy previously. The doses of SL were 40-60 and 30 mg twice daily separately. They were administered for 7 days in a 2-week cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression.

resultsOf the 41 enrolled patients, 36 patients were evaluable with 61.1% disease control rate. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.55 and 7.63 months, respectively. Regression change in tumor size stayed 10%-20% in five patients (13.9%) through 18 weeks after treatment, and two patients continued free from tumor progression at 30 and 42 weeks. Compared with moderate heavily pretreated mCRC patient subgroup (≤4 prior regimens), the severe heavily pretreated subgroup (≥5 prior regimens) showed similar disease control rate and survival benefit. Grade 3 or higher toxicities were documented only in 11 patients (26.8%).

conclusionSL shows potential as a salvage regimen in refractory mCRC patients especially in the severe heavily pretreated setting and is well tolerated in these patients.

Indexed as

oral leucovorinPhase IIrefractory metastatic colorectal cancerS-1survival and safety

Identifiers

PMID30538555
PMCPMC6252780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.