Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30538536›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2018

Pain measurement techniques: spotlight on mechanically ventilated patients.

Isabela Freire Azevedo-Santos, Josimari Melo DeSantana

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05811208 (Use of Automated Pupillometry for Pain Assessment in ICU Patients With Delirium), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05811208 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Use of Automated Pupillometry for Pain Assessment in ICU Patients With Delirium

TypeobservationalSponsorSt. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech RepublicRan2023 to 2026Enrolled49ConditionsDelirium, Pain, PostoperativeArmsautomated pupillometry, questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam).Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pain Assessment in Intensive Care Unit: A Forgotten Entity or a Quality Indicator?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Clinical Utility of the Behavioral Pain Assessment Tool in Patients Admitted in the Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  8. Translation into Spanish and Cultural Adaptation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabela Freire Azevedo-SantosNeuroscience Research Laboratory (LAPENE), Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate Program of Health Science, Graduate Program of Physiological Science, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil, desantana@pq.cnpq.br.
Josimari Melo DeSantanaNeuroscience Research Laboratory (LAPENE), Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate Program of Health Science, Graduate Program of Physiological Science, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil, desantana@pq.cnpq.br.
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProcedural pain is a frequent problem in intensive care units (ICUs). For that, pain assessment has been increasingly introduced to the ICU professional's routine, and studies have been developed to show the relevance of measuring pain in critically ill patients.

objectiveThis review aimed to describe pain measurement techniques for mechanically ventilated adult patients based on evidence and already published.

methodSystematic literature search was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar. Keywords "pain", "pain measurement", "intensive care units" and "respiration, artificial" were combined to the Boolean operator AND. No language or publication year was limited in this search. The purpose and method of all papers were analyzed and only studies which described pain assessment in mechanically ventilated patients were included in this review.

resultsObjective methods were found in the literature to assess pain in mechanically ventilated adults. Behavioral scales were the most used method for pain measurement in noncommunicative patients. Vital signs were used, but the reliability of this method was questioned. Pupillometry, bispectral index and skin conductance were found and described as pain assessment methods.

conclusionThis review showed that objective measures, as behavioral scales, are the gold standard tools to measure pain intensity in noncommunicative subjects. These data contribute to professionals' knowledge about ICU pain measurement and emphasize its importance and consequences for adequate pain management.

Indexed as

artificialintensive care unitspainpain measurementrespiration

Identifiers

PMID30538536
PMCPMC6255280
OpenAlexW2901105231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.