Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30538516›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2018

Is there an association between liraglutide use and female breast cancer in a real-world setting?

Donnie Funch, Kathleen Mortimer, Ling Li, Heather Norman, Atheline Major-Pedersen, Anne Helene Olsen, Margit S Kaltoft, David D Dore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Donnie FunchOptum Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA, david.dore@optum.com.
Kathleen MortimerOptum Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA, david.dore@optum.com.
Ling LiOptum Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA, david.dore@optum.com.
Heather NormanOptum Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA, david.dore@optum.com.
Atheline Major-PedersenGlobal Safety, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne Helene OlsenEpidemiology, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Margit S KaltoftGlobal Development, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
David D DoreOptum Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA, david.dore@optum.com.
New England College of Optometry · USNovo Nordisk (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiraglutide is a human glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist approved for treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus at a maximum dose of 1.8 mg/day (Victoza PATIENTS AND

methodsWomen initiating liraglutide or other antidiabetic therapies and who were enrolled in a large US health plan (2010-2014) were included. Comparisons of BC incidence rates were made between matched cohorts of initiators of liraglutide and cohorts of initiators of exenatide, metformin, pioglitazone, sulfonylureas, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors separately and as two "all comparators" groupings: with or without exenatide. Women with two or more claims with BC diagnosis codes within 61days of each other were identified as possible cases, with additional confirmation by clinician review of comprehensive claims listings. Propensity score matched intention-to-treat (ITT) and time-on-drug (TOD) analyses were completed via Poisson regression. A latency analysis was performed.

resultsRelative risks for BC for liraglutide vs comparators from the ITT analyses ranged from 0.90 (95% CI: 0.67-1.22) for both the "all comparator" and "all comparator except exenatide" cohorts to 1.46 (95% CI: 0.96-2.22) relative to exenatide. Latency analyses excluding the first year of follow-up yielded slightly attenuated point estimates. The TOD analyses of cumulative use of liraglutide suggested no increased risk of BC.

conclusionNeither the ITT (overall or latency analysis) nor cumulative TOD analyses suggested an elevated risk of BC among liraglutide initiators. Short length of follow-up and the potential for confounding by unmeasured factors limit the full assessment of long-term risk.

Indexed as

administrative claimsglucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonistintention-to-treattime-on-drugtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30538516
PMCPMC6254592
OpenAlexW2900547056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.