Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30538376›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2018

Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas Clinicopathological Characteristics and Long-Term Outcome: a Single-Center Experience.

Ashish Sachan, Hirdaya H Nag, Neha Nischal, Sandip Barman, Ravindra K Saran, Phani K Nekarakanti, Ashok Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashish SachanDepartment of GI Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), Room no. 220, New Delhi, 110002 India.
Hirdaya H NagDepartment of GI Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), Room no. 220, New Delhi, 110002 India.
Neha NischalDepartment of Radiology, GIPMER, New Delhi, India.
Sandip BarmanDepartment of Pathology, GIPMER, New Delhi, India.
Ravindra K SaranDepartment of Pathology, GIPMER, New Delhi, India.
Phani K NekarakantiDepartment of GI Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), Room no. 220, New Delhi, 110002 India.
Ashok SharmaDepartment of Radiology, GIPMER, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm is a rare tumor of the pancreas. These tumors are considered to have low malignant potential with good prognosis. Due to its rarity, details about clinical presentation and management of the disease are not very clear. This study aims to share our experience and to describe management of the disease. We retrospectively evaluated patients 13 patients diagnosed with SPT on histopathological examination of resected specimen. Data on their clinicopathological, management-related factors, and follow-up was collected. All the patients were females, with a median age of 20 years. Abdominal pain was the most common presentation. The mean tumor size was 6.5 cm and majority of tumors were located in the head region. R0 resection was obtained in all the patients. All patients were disease-free with a median follow-up of 68 months. Excellent prognosis can be achieved with a margin-negative resection in these tumors. Adjacent organ or vascular involvement is not a contraindication for surgical resection.

Indexed as

Distal pancreatectomySolid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreasWhipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy

Identifiers

PMID30538376
PMCPMC6265197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.