Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30538267›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Design Optimization of Tumor Vasculature-Bound Nanoparticles.

Ibrahim M Chamseddine, Hermann B Frieboes, Michael Kokkolaras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Rational nanoparticle design: Optimization using insights from experiments and mathematical models.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Hybrid modeling frameworks of tumor development and treatment.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ibrahim M ChamseddineDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Hermann B FrieboesDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-4286
Michael KokkolarasDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. michael.kokkolaras@mcgill.ca.

Funding

Integrated framework to predict chemotherapy response post lung tumor resectionR15CA203605 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI FRIEBOES, HERMANN · 2016 to 2016
$462k
Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) 436193-2013NCI NIH HHS R15 CA203605U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R15CA203605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotherapy may constitute a promising approach to target tumors with anticancer drugs while minimizing systemic toxicity. Computational modeling can enable rapid evaluation of nanoparticle (NP) designs and numerical optimization. Here, an optimization study was performed using an existing tumor model to find NP size and ligand density that maximize tumoral NP accumulation while minimizing tumor size. Optimal NP avidity lies at lower bound of feasible values, suggesting reduced ligand density to prolong NP circulation. For the given set of tumor parameters, optimal NP diameters were 288 nm to maximize NP accumulation and 334 nm to minimize tumor diameter, leading to uniform NP distribution and adequate drug load. Results further show higher dependence of NP biodistribution on the NP design than on tumor morphological parameters. A parametric study with respect to drug potency was performed. The lower the potency of the drug, the bigger the difference is between the maximizer of NP accumulation and the minimizer of tumor size, indicating the existence of a specific drug potency that minimizes the differential between the two optimal solutions. This study shows the feasibility of applying optimization to NP designs to achieve efficacious cancer nanotherapy, and offers a first step towards a quantitative tool to support clinical decision making.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsComputer SimulationDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlesNeoplasmsTissue DistributionAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Carriers

Identifiers

PMID30538267
PMCPMC6290012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.