ArticleBritish journal of cancer2019
Desperately seeking…Models to find the right partner and the best use for checkpoint inhibitors.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering neoantigen vaccines to improve cancer personalized immunotherapy.International journal of biological sciences · 2022Review
- Patient-derived explants (PDEs) as a powerful preclinical platform for anti-cancer drug and biomarker discovery.British journal of cancer · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown unprecedented clinical activity in a variety of cancer types, but only in a fraction of patients. Promising in vivo synergies have been demonstrated between checkpoint inhibitors and other drugs and/or chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and effective models are now needed to select the best combinatorial regimen and disease setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.