Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30538242›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Transcription factor DUO1 generated by neo-functionalization is associated with evolution of sperm differentiation in plants.

Asuka Higo, Tomokazu Kawashima, Michael Borg, Mingmin Zhao, Irene López-Vidriero, Hidetoshi Sakayama, Sean A Montgomery, Hiroyuki Sekimoto, Dieter Hackenberg, Masaki Shimamura and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intermediate evolutionary state of motile sperm and pollen tubes in the extant gymnospermProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Conserved carotenoid pigmentation in reproductive organs of Charophyceae.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Asuka HigoGraduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Tomokazu KawashimaGregor Mendel Institute (GMI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-3070
Michael BorgGregor Mendel Institute (GMI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
Mingmin ZhaoDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Irene López-VidrieroUnidad de Genómica, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, CNB-CSIC, Campus de Cantoblanco, C/Darwin 3, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Hidetoshi SakayamaDepartment of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan.
Sean A MontgomeryGregor Mendel Institute (GMI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
Hiroyuki SekimotoDepartment of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Japan Women's University, 2-8-1 Mejirodai, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 112-8681, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7362-2324
Dieter HackenbergDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Masaki ShimamuraDepartment of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8526, Japan.
Tomoaki NishiyamaAdvanced Science Research Center, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, 920-8640, Japan.
Keiko SakakibaraDepartment of Life Science, College of Science, Rikkyo University, 3-34-1 Nishi-Ikebukuro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 171-8501, Japan.
Yuki TomitaGraduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Taisuke TogawaFaculty of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Kinokawa, 649-6493, Japan.
Kan KunimotoGraduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Akihisa OsakabeGregor Mendel Institute (GMI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
Yutaka SuzukiDepartment of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, 277-8562, Japan.
Katsuyuki T YamatoFaculty of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Kinokawa, 649-6493, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7130-0911
Kimitsune IshizakiDepartment of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0504-8196
Ryuichi NishihamaGraduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7032-732X
Takayuki KohchiGraduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9712-4872
José M Franco-ZorrillaUnidad de Genómica, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, CNB-CSIC, Campus de Cantoblanco, C/Darwin 3, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
David TwellDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Frédéric BergerGregor Mendel Institute (GMI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria. Frederic.Berger@gmi.oeaw.ac.at.
Takashi ArakiGraduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. taraqui@lif.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3616-1493

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 2163Austrian Science Fund FWF M 2539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary mechanisms underlying innovation of cell types have remained largely unclear. In multicellular eukaryotes, the evolutionary molecular origin of sperm differentiation is unknown in most lineages. Here, we report that in algal ancestors of land plants, changes in the DNA-binding domain of the ancestor of the MYB transcription factor DUO1 enabled the recognition of a new cis-regulatory element. This event led to the differentiation of motile sperm. After neo-functionalization, DUO1 acquired sperm lineage-specific expression in the common ancestor of land plants. Subsequently the downstream network of DUO1 was rewired leading to sperm with distinct morphologies. Conjugating green algae, a sister group of land plants, accumulated mutations in the DNA-binding domain of DUO1 and lost sperm differentiation. Our findings suggest that the emergence of DUO1 was the defining event in the evolution of sperm differentiation and the varied modes of sexual reproduction in the land plant lineage.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularCell DifferentiationChlorophytaGerm Cells, PlantPhylogenyPlant ProteinsPlantsTranscription FactorsPlant ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID30538242
PMCPMC6290024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.