Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30537580›Full record

ReviewThe Science of the total environment2019

Impact of upstream oil extraction and environmental public health: A review of the evidence.

Jill E Johnston, Esther Lim, Hannah Roh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Science of the total environment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sociodemographic and Population Exposure to Upstream Oil and Gas Operations in Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Toxicological Effects of Inhaled Crude Oil Vapor.Current environmental health reports · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jill E JohnstonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: jillj@usc.edu.
Esther LimSouthern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Hannah RohDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES007048 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ROB S MCCONNELL · 1996 to 2026
$46.4M
Health and Air Pollution Near Urban Oil Drilling SitesR21ES027695 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JOHNSTON, JILL E · 2016 to 2017
$478k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007048NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES027695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upstream oil extraction, which includes exploration and operation to bring crude oil to the surface, frequently occurs near human populations. There are approximately 40,000 oil fields globally and 6 million people that live or work nearby. Oil extraction can impact local soil, water, and air, which in turn can influence community health. As oil resources are increasingly being extracted near human populations, we highlight the current scope of scientific knowledge regarding potential community health impacts with the aim to help identify scientific gaps and inform policy discussions surrounding oil drilling operations. In this review, we assess the wide range of both direct and indirect impacts that oil drilling operations can have on human health, with specific emphasis on understanding the body of scientific literature to assess potential environmental and health risks to residents living near active onshore oil extraction sites. From an initial literature search capturing 2236 studies, we identified 22 human studies, including 5 occupational studies, 5 animal studies, 6 experimental studies and 31 oil drilling-related exposure studies relevant to the scope of this review. The current evidence suggests potential health impacts due to exposure to upstream oil extraction, such as cancer, liver damage, immunodeficiency, and neurological symptoms. Adverse impacts to soil, air, and water quality in oil drilling regions were also identified. Improved characterization of exposures by community health studies and further study of the chemical mixtures associated with oil extraction will be critical to determining the full range of health risks to communities living near oil extraction.

Indexed as

Oil and Gas FieldsAnimalsEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental HealthEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutionHumansPublic HealthCancerContaminationHuman healthOil extractionPetroleum

Identifiers

PMID30537580
PMCPMC6344296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.