Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30537400›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2019

Microneedle-Mediated Vaccine Delivery to the Oral Mucosa.

Rachel L Creighton, Kim A Woodrow

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. RecombinantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Pre-assembled nanospheres in mucoadhesive microneedle patch for sustained release of triamcinolone in the treatment of oral submucous fibrosis.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Vaccines · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel L CreightonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7228-8451
Kim A WoodrowDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9508-8804
University of Washington · US

Funding

VENEREAL DISEASET32AI007140 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Julia Cook Dombrowski · 1985 to 2026
$19.4M
Nanomaterials for engineering protection in the genital mucosaDP2HD075703 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WOODROW, KIM A. · 2012 to 2012
$2.3M
Combination HIV prevention in drug-eluting fibers: designing for efficacy and useR01AI112002 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WOODROW, KIM A. · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI112002NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007140NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD075703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The oral mucosa is a minimally invasive and immunologically rich site that is underutilized for vaccination due to physiological and immunological barriers. To develop effective oral mucosal vaccines, key questions regarding vaccine residence time, uptake, adjuvant formulation, dose, and delivery location must be answered. However, currently available dosage forms are insufficient to address all these questions. An ideal oral mucosal vaccine delivery system would improve both residence time and epithelial permeation while enabling efficient delivery of physicochemically diverse vaccine formulations. Microneedles have demonstrated these capabilities for dermal vaccine delivery. Additionally, microneedles enable precise control over delivery properties like depth, uniformity, and dosing, making them an ideal tool to study oral mucosal vaccination. Select studies have demonstrated the feasibility of microneedle-mediated oral mucosal vaccination, but they have only begun to explore the broad functionality of microneedles. This review describes the physiological and immunological challenges related to oral mucosal vaccine delivery and provides specific examples of how microneedles can be used to address these challenges. It summarizes and compares the few existing oral mucosal microneedle vaccine studies and offers a perspective for the future of the field.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsNeedlesVaccinationAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsHumansMouth MucosaVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicVaccinesdosage formsimmune tolerancemucosal immunizationsustained release

Identifiers

PMID30537400
PMCPMC6476557
OpenAlexW2904320801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.