ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2019
Dynamic recognition and repair of DNA complex damage.
Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A robust photoluminescence screening assay identifies uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitors against prostate cancer.Chemical science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irradiation (IR) can be used to treat cancer by inducing complex and irreparable DNA damage in the cancer cells, which may lead to their apoptotic death. However, little is known about the molecular mechanism of this DNA damage. Here, the non-small-cell lung cancer cell line A549 was treated with either X-ray or carbon ion combined with bleomycin (BLM). The cell survival rate, frequency of double-strand breaks (DSBs), dynamic changes in γH2AX, and p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1), and protein expression of Ku70, Rad51, and XRCC1 were determined by the clone formation assay, agarose gel electrophoresis, immunofluorescence, and western blot analysis. The results showed that the most obvious complex DSBs occurred in the carbon IR + BLM group. The number of γH2AX and 53BP1 foci in the 0.5 hr X-ray IR + BLM group was the highest (p < 0.001) among all the groups. γH2AX foci were detected in the nucleus at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hr, but were distributed throughout the cell at 6 hr after IR in the carbon ion IR + BLM group. The expression of Ku70 increased and XRCC1 decreased at 2 and 6 hr after IR. Our data indicate that a DNA damage frequency of 13.4/Mbp is caused by clustered DNA damage and further show a correlation between γH2AX, 53BP1, and XRCC1 levels and the extent of DNA damage. The results of this study provide insights into DNA damage recognition and a rationale for the clinical use of radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.