Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30537073›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2019

Delivery of Preventive Oral Health Services by Rurality: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Caroline K Geiger, Ashley M Kranz, Andrew W Dick, Erin Duffy, Mark Sorbero, Bradley D Stein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Oral Health in America: Implications for dental practice.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2022
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline K GeigerRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ashley M KranzRAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0003-0507-7800
Andrew W DickRAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts.
Erin DuffyPardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, California.
Mark SorberoRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bradley D SteinRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
RAND Corporation · USRAND School of Public Policy · US

Funding

Role of Non-Dental Providers in Reducing Disparities in Early Childhood Oral Health: Impact of State Medicaid PoliciesR01DE026136 · NIDCR · RAND CORPORATION · PI STEIN, BRADLEY D · 2016 to 2018
$1.6M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntegrating oral health care into primary care has been promoted as a strategy to increase delivery of preventive oral health services (POHS) to young children, particularly in rural areas where few dentists practice. Using a multistate sample of Medicaid claims, we examined a child's odds of receiving POHS in a medical office by county rurality.

methodsWe used 2012-2014 Medicaid Analytic extract claims data for 6,275,456 children younger than 6 years in 39 states that allowed Medicaid payment for POHS in medical offices. We used county-level characteristics from the Area Health Resources Files, including a 3-level measure of county rurality. We used logistic regression to estimate a child's odds of receiving POHS in a medical office by county rurality, while controlling for other patient and county characteristics.

findingsPOHS in medical offices were received by 7.8% of children. Rates of POHS in medical offices were higher in metropolitan (metro) counties (8.4%) than nonmetro adjacent to metro (5.8%) and nonmetro not adjacent to metro (4.3%). In adjusted analysis, children living in nonmetro not adjacent to metro (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.99) and adjacent to metro counties (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.82) were significantly less likely to receive POHS in medical offices than children living in metro counties.

conclusionsIn this study of POHS in medical offices among young Medicaid-enrolled children, we found POHS rates were lowest in nonmetro counties. Given barriers to dental care in rural areas, states should take additional steps beyond allowing Medicaid reimbursement to increase delivery of POHS in medical offices.

Indexed as

Oral HealthChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantLogistic ModelsMaleMedicaidPreventive MedicineRural PopulationUnited Statesaccess to dental carechild healthMedicaidpediatricspreventive oral health services

Identifiers

PMID30537073
PMCPMC6298795
OpenAlexW2904590086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.