Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30536906›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2019

Detection of Brodifacoum and other Rodenticides in Drug Mixtures using Thermal Desorption Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry (TD-DART-MS).

Elizabeth L Robinson, Edward Sisco

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interpol Review of Drug Analysis 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Creation and Release of an Updated NIST DART-MS Forensics Database.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Article
  6. Forensic applications of DART-MS: A review of recent literature.Forensic chemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth L RobinsonNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, MS 8371, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899.
Edward SiscoNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, MS 8371, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899.
National Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent months, there has been increased reporting of seized drug and toxicology cases containing rodenticides, the active ingredient in rat poisons. Seeing as rodenticides are not scheduled substances, they are not commonly screened for in seized drug analysis. This work investigates the use of TD-DART-MS for the simultaneous detection of rodenticides and drugs. Six rodenticides were evaluated, an optimal method was established, and limits of detection in the tens of nanograms were calculated. Additional studies highlight that detection at less than 1% by weight in mixtures with AB-FUBINACA, cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine was possible. This work presents an optimized method for detection of these compounds, allowing for the simultaneous detection of drugs and rodenticides, providing drug chemists with a tool for rapid identification of these compounds for forensic or public health purposes.

Indexed as

Drug Contamination4-HydroxycoumarinsForensic ToxicologyHumansIllicit DrugsMass SpectrometryRodenticides4-HydroxycoumarinsbromfenacoumIllicit DrugsRodenticidesbrodifacoumDART-MSdrug analysisforensic sciencerodenticidesscreeningsynthetic cannabinoids

Identifiers

PMID30536906
PMCPMC6602815
OpenAlexW2904655277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.