Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30536848›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2019

Persistence of fluorescent nanoparticle-labelled bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and after intra-articular injection.

Sicilia T Grady, Lorraine Britton, Katrin Hinrichs, Alan J Nixon, Ashlee E Watts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quantum dots for bone tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sicilia T GradyDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9140-7855
Lorraine BrittonDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Katrin HinrichsDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8581-3814
Alan J NixonClinical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Ashlee E WattsDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8483-9182

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN COMPARATIVE MEDICINET32RR007059 · NCRR · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI PARKER, JOHN S · 1995 to 2011
$4.2M
Gene induction of stem cell chrondrogenesisF32AR057299 · NIAMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI WATTS, ASHLEE ELANE · 2009 to 2011
$168k
NCRR NIH HHS T32 RR007059NIAMS NIH HHS F32 AR057299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) improve the osteoarthritis condition, but the fate of MSCs after intra-articular injection is unclear. We used fluorescent nanoparticles (quantum dots [QDs]) to track equine MSCs (QD-labelled MSCs [QD-MSCs]) in vivo after intra-articular injection into normal and osteoarthritic joints. One week after injection of QD-MSCs, unlabelled MSCs, or vehicle, we determined the presence of QD-MSCs in synovium and articular cartilage histologically. In vitro, we evaluated the persistence of QDs in MSCs and whether QDs affected proliferation, immunophenotype, or differentiation. In joints injected with QD-MSCs, labelled cells were identified on the synovial membrane and significantly less often on articular cartilage, without differences between normal and osteoarthritic joints. Joints injected with QD-MSCs and MSCs had increased synovial total nucleated cell count and protein compared with vehicle-injected joints. In vitro, QDs persisted in nonproliferating cells for up to 8 weeks (length of the study), but QD fluorescence was essentially absent from proliferating cells within two passages (approximately 3 to 5 days). QD labelling did not affect MSC differentiation into chondrocytes, adipocytes, and osteocytes. QD-MSCs had slightly different immunophenotype from control cells, but whether this was due to an effect of the QDs or to drift during culture is unknown. QD-MSCs can be visualized in histological sections 1 week after intra-articular injection and are more frequently found in the synovial membrane versus cartilage in both normal and osteoarthritic joints. QDs do not alter MSC viability and differentiation potential in vitro. However, QDs are not optimal markers for long-term tracking of MSCs, especially under proliferative conditions.

Indexed as

Horse DiseasesJointsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationOsteoarthritisAllograftsAnimalsBone Marrow CellsHorsesMesenchymal Stem CellsQuantum Dotsbone marrowcell trackingintra-articular injectionmesenchymal stem cellosteoarthritisquantum dot

Identifiers

PMID30536848
PMCPMC6393194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.