Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30536656›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2019

Recurrence of periocular basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma after Mohs micrographic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

F Weesie, N C Naus, D Vasilic, L M Hollestein, R R van den Bos, M Wakkee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Swiss Recommendations for Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma.Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Paired-agent imaging as a rapidFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F WeesieDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1067-1559
N C NausDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
D VasilicDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
L M HollesteinDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8922-6791
R R van den BosDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
M WakkeeDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8578-901X
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the widespread use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for periocular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) - together called keratinocyte carcinoma (KC) - follow-up data regarding recurrences are limited.

objectivesTo investigate the recurrence rate for periocular KCs after MMS and to describe our experience with interdisciplinary collaborations.

methodsPatients with periocular KCs treated with MMS between 2006 and 2016 in a tertiary MMS referral hospital were included in this retrospective cohort study. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the MMS procedure-related characteristics. Using follow-up data from the electronic patient records and linkage with the Dutch nationwide network and registry of histopathology and cytopathology on 30 June 2017, the recurrence rate was evaluated and calculated using a cumulative incidence curve.

resultsIn total, 683 (93·7%) periocular BCCs and 46 (6·3%) SCCs were treated with MMS. Three-quarters (n = 549) were primary tumours and the majority were located at the medial canthus or lower eyelid (n = 649, 89·0%). In 505 MMS procedures (69·3%) an oculoplastic surgeon participated, and in 63 patients (8·6%) a plastic surgeon performed the reconstruction. After a median follow-up of 46 months the recurrence rate was 3·0%, based on 22 recurrences (20 BCCs and two SCCs).

conclusionsMMS is an excellent treatment option for periocular KCs, with a low recurrence rate. Due to this specific anatomical location an interdisciplinary approach should pre-eminently be considered.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBasal Cell CarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellEyelid NeoplasmsEyelidsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceLacrimal ApparatusMaleMiddle AgedMohs SurgeryNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID30536656
PMCPMC6849866
OpenAlexW2904880576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.