Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30536635›Full record

ArticleProteins2019

Partner-specific prediction of RNA-binding residues in proteins: A critical assessment.

Yong Jung, Yasser El-Manzalawy, Drena Dobbs, Vasant G Honavar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yong JungBioinformatics and Genomics Graduate Program, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-4390
Yasser El-ManzalawyArtificial Intelligence Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Drena DobbsBioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Vasant G HonavarBioinformatics and Genomics Graduate Program, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-5399-3489
Pennsylvania State University · USIowa State University · US

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Penn State Biomedical Big Data to Knowledge (B2D2K) Training ProgramT32LM012415 · NLM · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BROACH, JAMES R., HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2016 to 2020
$1.2M
Discovery of Protein Seq.Struct.Func.RelationshipsR33GM066387 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2005 to 2006
$545k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NIGMS NIH HHS R33 GM066387NIH HHS NCATS UL1 TR002014-01NLM NIH HHS T32 LM012415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA-protein interactions play essential roles in regulating gene expression. While some RNA-protein interactions are "specific", that is, the RNA-binding proteins preferentially bind to particular RNA sequence or structural motifs, others are "non-RNA specific." Deciphering the protein-RNA recognition code is essential for comprehending the functional implications of these interactions and for developing new therapies for many diseases. Because of the high cost of experimental determination of protein-RNA interfaces, there is a need for computational methods to identify RNA-binding residues in proteins. While most of the existing computational methods for predicting RNA-binding residues in RNA-binding proteins are oblivious to the characteristics of the partner RNA, there is growing interest in methods for partner-specific prediction of RNA binding sites in proteins. In this work, we assess the performance of two recently published partner-specific protein-RNA interface prediction tools, PS-PRIP, and PRIdictor, along with our own new tools. Specifically, we introduce a novel metric, RNA-specificity metric (RSM), for quantifying the RNA-specificity of the RNA binding residues predicted by such tools. Our results show that the RNA-binding residues predicted by previously published methods are oblivious to the characteristics of the putative RNA binding partner. Moreover, when evaluated using partner-agnostic metrics, RNA partner-specific methods are outperformed by the state-of-the-art partner-agnostic methods. We conjecture that either (a) the protein-RNA complexes in PDB are not representative of the protein-RNA interactions in nature, or (b) the current methods for partner-specific prediction of RNA-binding residues in proteins fail to account for the differences in RNA partner-specific versus partner-agnostic protein-RNA interactions, or both.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceBinding SitesModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsRNARNA-Binding MotifsRNA-Binding ProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareProteinsRNARNA-Binding Proteinspartner-specific protein-RNA bindingperformance evaluationprotein-RNA interactionsprotein-RNA Interface predictionRNA-specificity metric

Identifiers

PMID30536635
PMCPMC6389706
OpenAlexW2903628238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.