ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2019
Opioid receptors and opioid peptides in the cardiomyogenesis of mouse embryonic stem cells.
Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the Effects of Opium on the Expression ofBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Endogenous Opioids and Their Role in Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Rescue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Nitro-Oleic Acid Inhibits Stemness Maintenance and Enhances Neural Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells via STAT3 Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Dynorphins in Development and Disease: Implications for Cardiovascular Disease.Current molecular medicine · 2020Review
- Conventional Echocardiography and Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking in Healthy Sevoflurane-Anesthetized Dogs Undergoing Continuous Rate Infusion of Nalbuphine.Veterinary medicine international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The stimulation of myocardium repair is restricted due to the limited understanding of heart regeneration. Interestingly, endogenous opioid peptides such as dynorphins and enkephalins are suggested to support this process. However, the mechanism-whether through the stimulation of the regenerative capacity of cardiac stem cells or through effects on other cell types in the heart-is still not completely understood. Thus, a model of the spontaneous cardiomyogenic differentiation of mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells via the formation of embryoid bodies was used to describe changes in the expression and localization of opioid receptors within cells during the differentiation process and the potential of the selected opioid peptides, dynorphin A and B, and methionin-enkephalins and leucin-enkephalins, to modulate cardiomyogenic differentiation in vitro. The expressions of both κ- and δ-opioid receptors significantly increased during mES cell differentiation. Moreover, their primary colocalization with the nucleus was followed by their growing presence on the cytoplasmic membrane with increasing mES cell differentiation status. Interestingly, dynorphin B enhanced the downregulation gene expression of Oct4 characteristic of the pluripotent phenotype. Further, dynorphin B also increased cardiomyocyte-specific Nkx2.5 gene expression. However, neither dynorphin A nor methionin-enkephalins and leucin-enkephalins exhibited any significant effects on the course of mES cell differentiation. In conclusion, despite the increased expression of opioid receptors and some enhancement of mES cell differentiation by dynorphin B, the overall data do not support the notion that opioid peptides have a significant potential to promote the spontaneous cardiomyogenesis of mES cells in vitro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.