Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30536427›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019

SUSAN: segment unannotated image structure using adversarial network.

Fang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 3D Domain Adaptive Instance Segmentation via Cyclic Segmentation GANs.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2023
    Article
  8. [A generative adversarial network-based unsupervised domain adaptation method for magnetic resonance image segmentation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. MR-contrast-aware image-to-image translations with generative adversarial networks.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  19. Improved amyloid burden quantification with nonspecific estimates using deep learning.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fang LiuDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0001-8032-6681

Funding

Unified Joint Statistical Reconstruction of PET & MRP41EB022544 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Kira Grogg · 2017 to 2026
$14.8M
Quantitative Oncologic PET-MRR01CA165221 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EL FAKHRI, GEORGES · 2012 to 2023
$4.7M
Multi-component T2 and T2* mapping of All Water Components of Articular CartilageR01AR068373 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KIJOWSKI, RICHARD · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA165221NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR068373NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB022544University of Wisconsin-Madison
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe and evaluate a segmentation method using joint adversarial and segmentation convolutional neural network to achieve accurate segmentation using unannotated MR image datasets. THEORY AND

methodsA segmentation pipeline was built using joint adversarial and segmentation network. A convolutional neural network technique called cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (CycleGAN) was applied as the core of the method to perform unpaired image-to-image translation between different MR image datasets. A joint segmentation network was incorporated into the adversarial network to obtain additional functionality for semantic segmentation. The fully automated segmentation method termed as SUSAN was tested for segmenting bone and cartilage on 2 clinical knee MR image datasets using images and annotated segmentation masks from an online publicly available knee MR image dataset. The segmentation results were compared using quantitative segmentation metrics with the results from a supervised U-Net segmentation method and 2 registration methods. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate the value difference of quantitative metrics between different methods.

resultsThe proposed method SUSAN provided high segmentation accuracy with results comparable to the supervised U-Net segmentation method (most quantitative metrics having P > 0.05) and significantly better than a multiatlas registration method (all quantitative metrics having P < 0.001) and a direct registration method (all quantitative metrics having P< 0.0001) for the clinical knee image datasets. SUSAN also demonstrated the applicability for segmenting knee MR images with different tissue contrasts.

conclusionSUSAN performed rapid and accurate tissue segmentation for multiple MR image datasets without the need for sequence specific segmentation annotation. The joint adversarial and segmentation network and training strategy have promising potential applications in medical image segmentation.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsCartilage, ArticularComputer GraphicsComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKneeKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSemanticsadversarial networkdeep learningimage annotationMRIsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID30536427
PMCPMC7140982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.