Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30536205›Full record

ReviewCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2019

Age-related variability in decision-making: Insights from neurochemistry.

Anne S Berry, William J Jagust, Ming Hsu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Alzheimer's Disease Pathologies Affect Dopaminergic Neural Mechanisms of Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. PET-MRI Applications and Future Prospects in Psychiatry.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cognitive Effort-Based Decision-Making Across Experimental and Daily Life Indices in Younger and Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Effects of Cannabis Use on Cognitive Function in Healthy Aging: A Systematic Scoping Review.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2021
    Article
  13. Noradrenergic correlates of chronic cocaine craving: neuromelanin and functional brain imaging.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Reward systems, cognition, and emotion: Introduction to the special issue.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Age-Related Differences in Motivational Integration and Cognitive Control.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  17. Dopaminergic Mechanisms Underlying Normal Variation in Trait Anxiety.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne S BerryHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. anneberry@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5086-3643
William J JagustHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Ming HsuHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

Funding

Program Development (Pilot)P30AG012839 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Magali Barbieri · 1999 to 2026
$18.6M
Aging Brain, Cognition, and DopamineR01AG044292 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI JAGUST, WILLIAM J. · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
Dopaminergic Mechanisms Underlying Human Social Behavior: A Multimodal ApproachR01MH112775 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HSU, MING, KAYSER, ANDREW S · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Neurobiological Substrates of Social Behavior: A Neuroeconomic FrameworkR01MH098023 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HSU, MING · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
Age effects on memory and reward systems in decision makingR00AG058748 · NIA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI BERRY, ANNE SHIVELY · 2019 to 2021
$745k
CRCNS: Neurocomputational substrates of monetary exchangeR01DA043196 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HSU, MING · 2016 to 2018
$474k
Age effects on memory and reward systems in decision makingK99AG058748 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI BERRY, ANNE SHIVELY · 2018 to 2019
$250k
NIA NIH HHS K99 AG058748NIA NIH HHS P30 AG012839NIA NIH HHS R00 AG058748NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044292NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043196NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098023NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite dopamine's significant role in models of value-based decision-making and findings demonstrating loss of dopamine function in aging, evidence of systematic changes in decision-making over the life span remains elusive. Previous studies attempting to resolve the neural basis of age-related alteration in decision-making have typically focused on physical age, which can be a poor proxy for age-related effects on neural systems. There is growing appreciation that aging has heterogeneous effects on distinct components of the dopamine system within subject in addition to substantial variability between subjects. We propose that some of the conflicting findings in age-related effects on decision-making may be reconciled if we can observe the underlying dopamine components within individuals. This can be achieved by incorporating in vivo imaging techniques including positron emission tomography (PET) and neuromelanin-sensitive MR. Further, we discuss how affective factors may contribute to individual differences in decision-making performance among older adults. Specifically, we propose that age-related shifts in affective attention ("positivity effect") can, in some cases, counteract the impact of altered dopamine function on specific decision-making processes, contributing to variability in findings. In an effort to provide clarity to the field and advance productive hypothesis testing, we propose ways in which in vivo dopamine imaging can be leveraged to disambiguate dopaminergic influences on decision-making, and suggest strategies for assessing individual differences in the contribution of affective attentional focus.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAffectAgingAttentionBrainDopamineHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMelaninsNeuroimagingPositron-Emission TomographyDopamineMelaninsneuromelaninagingdecision-makingdopaminePETpositivity effect

Identifiers

PMID30536205
PMCPMC6684213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.