Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30536148›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Time course of changes in corticospinal excitability induced by motor imagery during action observation combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation.

Takahito Yasui, Tomofumi Yamaguchi, Shigeo Tanabe, Tsuyoshi Tatemoto, Yoko Takahashi, Kunitsugu Kondo, Michiyuki Kawakami

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observation of others' actions during limb immobilization prevents the subsequent decay of motor performance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Takahito YasuiTokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, 4-1-1 Yatsu, Narashino-shi, Chiba, 275-0026, Japan.
Tomofumi YamaguchiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Yamagata Prefectural University of Health Sciences, 260 Kamiyanagi, Yamagata-shi, Yamagata, 990-2212, Japan. yama_to_izu_tukigase@hotmail.com.
Shigeo TanabeFaculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake-shi, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TatemotoFaculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake-shi, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Yoko TakahashiTokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, 4-1-1 Yatsu, Narashino-shi, Chiba, 275-0026, Japan.
Kunitsugu KondoTokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, 4-1-1 Yatsu, Narashino-shi, Chiba, 275-0026, Japan.
Michiyuki KawakamiTokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, 4-1-1 Yatsu, Narashino-shi, Chiba, 275-0026, Japan.
Fujita Health University Hospital · JPHebei Rehabilitation Hospital · JPKeio University Hospital · JPYamagata Prefectural University of Health Sciences · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 15K16370Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K17723Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP16K19521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While previous studies assessed corticospinal excitability changes during and after motor imagery (MI) or action observation (AO) combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation (ES), we examined, for the first time, the time course of corticospinal excitability changes for MI during AO combined with ES (AO-MI + ES) using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in healthy individuals. Fourteen healthy volunteers participated in the following three sessions on different days: AO-MI alone, ES alone, and AO-MI + ES. In the AO-MI task, participants imagined squeezing and relaxing a ball, along with the respective actions shown in a movie, while passively holding the ball. We applied ES (intensity, 90% of the motor threshold) to the ulnar nerve at the wrist, which innervates the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. We assessed the FDI muscle MEPs at baseline and after every 5 min of the task for a total of 20 min. Additionally, participants completed the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2 (VMIQ-2) at the beginning of the experiment. Compared to baseline, AO-MI + ES significantly increased corticospinal excitability after 10 min, while AO-MI or ES alone had no effect on corticospinal excitability after 20 min. Moreover, the AO-MI + ES-induced cortical excitability changes were correlated with the VMIQ-2 scores for visual and kinaesthetic imagery. Collectively, our findings indicate that AO-MI + ES induces cortical plasticity earlier than does AO-MI or ES alone and that an individual's imagery ability plays an important role in inducing cortical excitability changes following AO-MI + ES.

Indexed as

AdultElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHandHumansImaginationMaleMotor ActivityMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalNeuronal PlasticityPyramidal TractsTime FactorsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationUlnar NerveAction observationMotor imageryNeural plasticityPeripheral nerve electrical stimulationRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID30536148
OpenAlexW2904327891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.