Trial reportRadiological physics and technology2019
Computed tomography pulmonary angiography and venography with a low dose of contrast medium.
Trial report in Radiological physics and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of non-rigid registration technique for misregistration in 3D-CTA fusion imaging.La Radiologia medica · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The authors developed a method to ensure sufficient opacification of pulmonary vasculature for separate depiction of arteries and veins in three-dimensional form with a small dose of contrast medium utilizing a test injection to determine optimal timing of computed tomography (CT) scanning. The dose was determined by a simulation based on a pharmacokinetic model. The contrast medium was administered at a rate of 5.0 mL/s for 3 s, followed by helical scanning at the timing determined by a dynamic CT scanning following the test injection. Images of 20 consecutive patients acquired with a 64-row CT scanner were evaluated. Quality of vessel depiction was assessed on the basis of the following: HU values at the main pulmonary artery (MPA) and left atrium (LA), distance between the pleural surface and the distal end of the pulmonary vessels on three-dimensional CT pulmonary arteriography and venography (3D-CTPAV), and subjective visual assessment of quality of the 3D-CTPAV images. Time to generate the 3D-CTPAV images was recorded. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the HU values at MPA/LA and the distances to the pleural surface for pulmonary arteries/veins were 448.0 ± 123.1/277.3 ± 60.85 HU and 9.21 ± 3.60/10.7 ± 5.45 mm, respectively. The image quality was visually rated as excellent for all of the patients. The mean time ± SD to generate 3D-CTPAV images was 13.6 ± 6.7 min. In conclusion, three-dimensional images of the pulmonary vasculature can be created using 21 mL (including 6 mL for the test injection) of contrast medium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.