Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535980›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2019

Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study.

Sofia Pihl, Eva Uustal, Marie Blomberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sofia PihlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden. sofia.pihl@regionostergotland.se.ORCID 0000-0002-4378-0663
Eva UustalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Marie BlombergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, SE-581 85, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisNo measurements are available for diagnosing the extent of obstetric lacerations. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured with transperineal ultrasound immediately after delivery and external anal sphincter injury. A secondary aim was to assess whether the palpated perineal thickness was associated with the AVD.

methodsA prospective observational study of 150 primiparous women at the University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden. After vaginal delivery, initial inspection and palpation of the perineal thickness were performed by the midwife. The women were then divided into subgroups depending on the degree of the suspected perineal laceration. Transperineal ultrasound of the AVD was performed by a physician. Diagnostics of the perineal laceration were done according to standard care.

resultsWomen with an external sphincter injury had a shorter AVD and shorter palpatory perineal thickness compared with women without anal sphincter injury. No external sphincter injuries were diagnosed when the AVD and/or palpation height was > 20 mm. The mean AVD in the group with probable second-degree laceration (n = 85) was 18.8 mm (95% CI 17.8-19.8), in suspected third-degree laceration (n = 33) 15.7 mm (95% CI 13.7-17.7) and in probable third-degree laceration (n = 32) 11.8 mm (95% CI 9.7-13.9) (p < 0.001).

conclusionsA short AVD could be a warning sign postpartum and should increase the awareness of possible external sphincter injury before suturing. An AVD of 20 mm seems to indicate a cutoff level of the occurrence of external sphincter injury, but this needs further evaluation.

Indexed as

AdultAnal CanalFemaleHumansLacerationsPalpationParturitionPerineumPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyProspective StudiesTrauma Severity IndicesUltrasonographyVaginaYoung AdultAnovaginal distanceObstetrical anal sphincter injuryPerineal lacerationTransperineal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID30535980
PMCPMC6511353
OpenAlexW2904634418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.