Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2019
Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intrapartum rectovaginal distance as a predictor of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective cohort study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Birth and Regulation of head Extension to Guide Manual perineal Assistance (BREGMA) study: a prospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Subclassification of second-degree tears at delivery: creation and reported outcomes.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Antenatal Anovaginal Distance, a Potential Indicator of Perineal Damage during Pregnancy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Sonographic postpartum anal sphincter defects and the association with pelvic floor pain and dyspareunia.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023Article
- The effect of organizational belonging and profession on clinicians' attitudes toward supporting vaginal birth and interprofessional teamwork-a cross-sectional study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023Article
- The impact of the nine-item list intervention on the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury in women with spontaneous and operative vaginal births.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisNo measurements are available for diagnosing the extent of obstetric lacerations. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured with transperineal ultrasound immediately after delivery and external anal sphincter injury. A secondary aim was to assess whether the palpated perineal thickness was associated with the AVD.
methodsA prospective observational study of 150 primiparous women at the University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden. After vaginal delivery, initial inspection and palpation of the perineal thickness were performed by the midwife. The women were then divided into subgroups depending on the degree of the suspected perineal laceration. Transperineal ultrasound of the AVD was performed by a physician. Diagnostics of the perineal laceration were done according to standard care.
resultsWomen with an external sphincter injury had a shorter AVD and shorter palpatory perineal thickness compared with women without anal sphincter injury. No external sphincter injuries were diagnosed when the AVD and/or palpation height was > 20 mm. The mean AVD in the group with probable second-degree laceration (n = 85) was 18.8 mm (95% CI 17.8-19.8), in suspected third-degree laceration (n = 33) 15.7 mm (95% CI 13.7-17.7) and in probable third-degree laceration (n = 32) 11.8 mm (95% CI 9.7-13.9) (p < 0.001).
conclusionsA short AVD could be a warning sign postpartum and should increase the awareness of possible external sphincter injury before suturing. An AVD of 20 mm seems to indicate a cutoff level of the occurrence of external sphincter injury, but this needs further evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.