ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2019
Quantitative flux coupling analysis.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Kinetic modules are sources of concentration robustness in biochemical networks.Science advances · 2025Article
- Metabolic modeling of Halomonas campaniensis improves polyhydroxybutyrate production under nitrogen limitation.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Relative flux trade-offs and optimization of metabolic network functionalities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Flux Coupling and the Objective Functions' Length in EFMs.Metabolites · 2020Article
- SWIFTCORE: a tool for the context-specific reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flux coupling analysis (FCA) aims to describe the functional dependencies among reactions in a metabolic network. Currently studied coupling relations are qualitative in the sense that they identify pairs of reactions for which the activity of one reaction necessitates the activity of the other one, but without giving any numerical bounds relating the possible activity rates. The potential applications of FCA are heavily investigated, however apart from some trivial cases there is no clue of what bottleneck in the metabolic network causes each dependency. In this article, we introduce a quantitative approach to the same flux coupling problem named quantitative flux coupling analysis (QFCA). It generalizes the current concepts as we show that all the qualitative information provided by FCA is readily available in the quantitative flux coupling equations of QFCA, without the need for any additional analysis. Moreover, we design a simple algorithm to efficiently identify these flux coupling equations which scales up to the genome-scale metabolic networks with thousands of reactions and metabolites in an effective way. Furthermore, this framework enables us to quantify the "strength" of the flux coupling relations. We also provide different biologically meaningful interpretations, including one which gives an intuitive certificate of precisely which metabolites in the network enforce each flux coupling relation. Eventually, we conclude by suggesting the probable application of QFCA to the metabolic gap-filling problem, which we only begin to address here and is left for future research to further investigate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.