Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535949›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Effect of caffeine on long-term potentiation-like effects induced by quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Ritsuko Hanajima, Nobuyuki Tanaka, Ryosuke Tsutsumi, Yuichiro Shirota, Takahiro Shimizu, Yasuo Terao, Yoshikazu Ugawa

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04011670 (Neuroplastic Alterations of the Motor Cortex by Caffeine), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04011670 nacompletednot on this map

Neuroplastic Alterations of the Motor Cortex by Caffeine: Differences Between Caffeine and Non-caffeine Users and Influence of Vigilance During Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GoettingenRan2019 to 2019Enrolled30ConditionsCortical Excitability, Brain Stimulation, CaffeineArms200 mg caffeine tablet, Non-active tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The future of brain circuit-targeted therapeutics.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Quadripulse stimulation (QPS).Experimental brain research · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ritsuko HanajimaDivision of Neurology, Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, Tottori, Japan. hanajima-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Nobuyuki TanakaDepartment of Neurology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryosuke TsutsumiDepartment of Neurology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichiro ShirotaDepartment of Neurology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro ShimizuDivision of Neurology, Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Yasuo TeraoDepartment of Neurology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshikazu UgawaDepartment of Neuro-Regeneration, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPTottori University · JPFukushima Medical University · JP

Funding

Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma nonDescartes Centre voor Wetenschapsgeschiedenis en Wetenschapsfilosofie, Universiteit Utrecht (NL) nonGlaxoSmithKline (GB) nonthe Magnetic Health Science Foundation nonthe Research Project Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 15H05881, 25293206, 22390181, 16H05322the Research Project Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 16K09709, 16H01497, 22590954the Research Project Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 26461308,17K09809, 15H05881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caffeine, an adenosine receptor antagonist, is known to affect sleep-awake cycles, the stress response, and learning and memory. It has been suggested that caffeine influences synaptic plasticity, but the effects of caffeine on synaptic plasticity in the human brain remain unexplored. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of caffeine on long-term potentiation (LTP)-like effects in the primary motor cortex of healthy humans. Twelve healthy participants (six women and six men; mean age: 44.8 ± 1.5 years) underwent quadripulse magnetic stimulation with an inter-stimulus interval of 5 ms (QPS5) to induce LTP-like effects, 2 h after administration of either a caffeine (200 mg) or placebo tablet in a double-blind crossover design. We recorded motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) before and after QPS5. The degree of MEP enhancement was compared between the placebo and caffeine conditions. Neither active nor resting motor thresholds were influenced by caffeine administration. Following caffeine administration, the degree of potentiation significantly decreased in "significant responders", whose average MEP ratios were greater than 1.24 in the placebo condition. The observed reduction in potentiation following caffeine administration is consistent with the A

Indexed as

AdultCaffeineCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansLong-Term PotentiationMaleMotor CortexPurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationCaffeinePurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsAdenosineCortical plasticityDopamineNon-invasive brain stimulationParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID30535949
OpenAlexW2903707530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.